◆ SpookStack

but was in that place ja the oity of Sniesgo, and therefore. ee = had BELSESS kay caGolidg May it plecse the Court and Gentlemen of ¢he Jury: The defense in thie esse will ressive iteelt @imply inte this, thetit je the slain of the respondent thet | the eoples* Witnesseg are misteken. is their Mdentitiention ops anne Saas : ity Simhe ee ‘of the ‘Hespondent: and the, evidence whi be inated §0. o-entehttahS ee rare " aghet: ‘slain, ‘that on Hho vaey in Qdentien “he” ~ of the robbery was being, eonnitied here, ‘in the sity ee “y Chicago, at an apertnent, which she’ witnesses wad ‘Adentaty and teaity to; that he was not in the eity of ‘Grane “Haven eould not Reve committed the robbery in question, *y ‘shtnk ae a that ‘briefly, gentlenen, is the eum and’ ‘ubstunes of the defense, ang to establish that, defense. she ‘Respondent will * = TA et Par ne oes produee witnosses who. will testify ore ‘Mebane. yous od would like ta a i as the Tirat witness, Bre eee 2 would Like to add to my opening atotenent one ie other thing, and that 4s that we mill show not only th. t the _ respondent waa in Chicsra and therefore could not have committed. the ering, tut wa exact to show by another witness who wes prasenk et the robbery tnd pertioipated in it, that this _veayondent wis not one ) of the & BE, and had mothing to id with —_ ‘the ropbery. sgt oP oe gees tosis E piaudy, being fret | duly sword ‘by the = Glerk, teatified as follows; P1BILT ARAGINATION BY MA, i 480N51 & yr, Seiley, you aye & resident of the City of Chisago, are yout 4 Yes, e@lr, = §6 «=