◆ SpookStack

wife sali Bt Baws See cary ene L Me py’ ot Gane a : are y ye b a . .. a se eta “poe The "abhet. “alein, that on ‘thot “dey” in question ‘ho was, ot “the. but was in. that place in the oity of Chiecgo, and therefore that briefly, gentlenen, is the eum and ‘substanes of the. DEF4HS KR. 24Q50N3; May it plecse the Court and Gentlemen of the Jury; The defense in this oase will resolve itself _ Simply into this, thatit is the claim of the respondent that . the +00ples! ‘witnesses are mi steken in their _Meattf tection ase =~ of the Respondent ‘ana the, evidence will be Introdueod to eateblish: ane of the robbery was being “connitted here, in | the. sity of’ Chicago, at an apertnent, whiob the witnesses wn Adentity ang testify to; that he was ‘Rot in the eity of Grand Haven Could not have committed the robbery in (Auestion, “I think defense, and to establish that Aetonse. the ‘Respondent wid Lrodues witnesses who will testity hero ‘before you. ; i would like to o ll as the first witness. ieckarert Bailey, .. a - oA esas 1 would like to add to my opening ato vesiont ‘one ee a other thing, and that - “1s that We will show not only th: t the. ao = respondent wea in Chieseo end therefore could not hava committed the crine, but we exect to show by another witness who wes _ prasent at the robbery and participated in it, ‘that this respondent » was not one of whe & es and had t nothing to do with: ‘Clerk, testified as follows: DIRECT SKAMINATIGN BY MR, GARSONS: © kr. Bailey, you are a resident of the City of Chieago, are you? A Yes, sir, =» 96 «