◆ SpookStack

ww ~ she was not m:rried to the respondent she lived in the same apartneat with him at that time in the city of Chiosgo, that sho w:s married to him later in November of thet year, but in the month of august eho was living with him anc they ware Boing. to the Fair, they had cone thare from British Columbia, and she. ‘says she renonbors ‘they, were living a there on the 16th of August, ow, gontzeren, those are the witnesses that testified on behalf of the respondents You - ara to weich. their testimony and consider what woight you think it is entitled to receive, You have these facts here that they tostified to, Da they remomber those things? inde;endent memory? 1f they do, are they telling the . truth atout it? These are mtters for you to considers another mttoer that I am requested to charge you | cone2ming is the fact that the res;ondent did not tuke the witnsss eat:nd. i think porheys it is unnecessary to scy anything atout thet. i huve told you that the People must est-blish tha casa and #11 of the elemsnts of the case . peyond a reasonable doubdt, and that the respondent ‘doosn't . hive to prove anything. A Msn accused of erima comes nto . Court clothsd with the prosunption of innoesnsos he Goesn't havo to yrovs @ thing. He can testify, he has a right to teke the witness tend and tesi:ify in his own beh=l1f; he has a right not to te -ke the witness stend and not to testify, end - the jury have no right to consider why he dia not take the stand, It ig a matter thet you are not to ‘consider at als: You ara to deoide whether the reople, from the evidence, the evidencs off3red in this cass, have est tlishec the guilt of the raspondant beyond a reasonable doubt, and you are not to take into consideration the fact that the respondent did not take the stand,