◆ SpookStack

4 ae Cuntack Pete tl en ee ee ee yee” SEE RTE}, Sa) Sen ea . . & a what has bean the practice of your bank? os wa i would say uniformly do not date them. However, o2rtain teliers might and certain @thers might not. 43 to thos: Kellon Nationel Bank tr:velers’ checks that were in the Fossession of the seoplos savings Fank of . er Grand Haven on the ieth of august, 1935, that were. stolen from the be nk on that date by benk robbers, » were we the detes of issue or ‘was, the dcte of issue fillea in on any of those blank travelers’ chocks? : Kot on any of them. 4nd so if this is, ag ngrect ¢ on the record, a photostatie copy of a travelera® check stolen fron the Feoples Savings Benk on the 16th asy of August, then this date ‘of issue a as it apposrs. on. this check, August 33, 1933, was filled in . at soma tine after ths time of the ‘robbary? That is correct. a tig tite and that august 30, 1633, as it epposrs here, is not forte of the printed form? A ho, it is note | | | MQ, DSPWERS: Thet is cll. MA. sntw0io3 ho cross examination. a TH: COLAT; Mr, bethmers, there is one other check thoro thut the juror shows m2, with no dcts on it at all; it has evidantly bean cashed, but ien't dated. Il think thet is a differant kind, the aneriesn. ee ao _ 2UR0R; anorican ‘axpraas. _ Jee ee ane (By ur. Dathners, rasuming) 1 show you here 6n original americin axpress Travelers’ check, besring pumbsr h-9954766, which bears no 4. te whatsoever, l ask you thet s:me cuestion relative to thsse trivelers’ ehecks, Is it ususl to fill in that dete at the tims tho bank salle those checks? - 161 -