◆ SpookStack

bo -l bic -1° (Rev. 01-31-2003) ©) , v3 .. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION | Precedence: ROUTINE b6 -1 To: Inspection - Attn: b7c -1 From:. CIRG. NCAVC, BAU - Approved. By: Tidwell J Stephen wets lhl Fedarcyvk Janice . Drafted By: Case ID #: 297-HQ-A1327669-A (Pending); 30 ' Title: COUNTERTERRORISM DIVISION, GTMO, © INSPECTION SPECIAL INQUIRY _— - b6 -1 Synopsis: ssal SOS did not personally witness any : “4 ; ° ; 7 - aggressive treatment, interrogations or interview techniques on pic =1 GTIMO detainees. Administrative: Reference electronic mailings ef AD Steven C. McCraw, Inspection Division, July 9 and 12, 2004. Details: ssal Critical Incident Response Group be -1 (CIRG), Behavioral Analysis Unit 3 (BAU-3) was deployed to eTmo 7° -} from July 17, 2003 - August 7, 2003. Members of the BAU Units were regularly deployed to GIMO to observe interviews of - detainees and provide interview strategies and other behavioral ~ assistance as needed. During my tenure at GTMO, I never personally witnessed any aggressive treatment, interrogations or interview techniques on GTMO detainees. ; On several occasions, I did hear loud music being played and people yelling loudly from behind closed doors of intervjew rooms but I could not say that detainees were present in those rooms. I also observed strobe lights in interview. rooms on several occasions but never observed those being used on ‘ detaineés. There were many comments made by investigators during my tenure at GTMO that every time the FBI established a rapport with a detainee, the military would step in and the detainee would stop being cooperative. The military did not stop the interviews while they were in progress but routinely took control ploode! “ul RESPONSES-243 !