◆ SpookStack

rari 7: Message . = | ‘. Q 7 Page i of 2 [tsp ray gg a. ve’ « nv 2 7. . fh ad [Jere ray ae yo subject RE: GTMO O*K, | will consider you a positive response. and no need for you to do the EC. ‘Once we-get “at in responses, a determination will be made as. te who gets interviewed. ‘Thanks-again. * ae ar? ss : an --—~-Driginal Message a a bg -1 4. Fromm (CTD} (FBI) b7c -1 Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:58-PM ee (FBI) Subject: RE: GTMO SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFI coe ' NON-RECORD , a Yes. There was an incidént of observation ofa detainee’ ina ‘stress ositior’ ‘This was within the regs of ‘ military techniques bufoutside MIOG (No Bureau personnel involved). That was the limit of direct observatians. In térins af knowledge of 'mistreatment | can speak to that in great detail from formal meetings whielt | attended and informa! discussions with DeD personnel. BC : vee 7 Log inal Message-—-- ; ‘From: {INSD) (FBI) Poot, Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:54 PM “BIC a ee Subject: RE; GT MO . o 7 _SE ITIVE uronc SSIFIED , >» NGN-RECOR' , OK, | will print this out and retain for when the interviews start. ‘twill take this as a negative . response for Bureau employees. Any observations of other agencies mistreatment of detainees? we -----Original Message--—-- - _ b6 -l — From: (CTD) (FBI) : b7c -1 - Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:38 PM ; : Ta: (INSD). (FBI) a Ce: (CTO) (FBT) a a ‘Subject: RE: GTMO _ SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED a ' RESPONSES-60 NON-RECORD 7 b6 -1 that ime. it seemed the Bureau 3 fools was denttying any fabilty in n the form of ‘direct involvement. | would be happy to sit down with-you and walk you through what | saw as the predictable onset of aggressive treatment, interrogations or interview techniques. ln short, the Bureau personnel there had no direct particiation: But | think | may be able to assist in. describing the landscape for you and giving you the details about where some things went off the tracks. | just:moved to TTIC (Tyson's Comer) and am phone- less, but | have thi is e-mait eee