◆ SpookStack

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION aff USA, San Prancisco Repo ol: bree yam ole. - Office, San Francisco Fietd Office File 9: 7-855 nd - a a3 . wo, “Bureau File 7 7=-15200 Title: HEARNAP’ Charocte: KIDNAPING Sysop; Anonymous letters to Kentucky State Police and similar letters . to Berkeley, California Police Department examined by FBI Laboratory and conclusion reached that typewriting on Qril, Q102 and Q10l, were prepared by the same typewriter. Qll2 and Q113 are envelope and cassette tape received by KSAN and Q125, Q126 and Q127 are envelope and cassette tapes directed to KDIA. A definite conclusion was not reached whether the questioned writing was prepared by the writers of the unidentified questioned writing in this case, the SLA case or the ASGM case. Q11l2 included one piece of brow plastic tape so and two pieces of white plastic tape. A bleached blond head ~~. hair of Caucasian origin 3 1/8 -inches™long was adhering to the white tape and is of limited value,for-comparisons, Q125 . includes a piece of brown plastic tape. The torn end of this tape matches the torn end of the brown plastic tape of Q112, The brown tape from Q112 and the brown tape from Q125 were originally one piece. The above concerning the brown plastic tape is also true concerning torn ends of the white plastic tape from Ql1l2 and Q125. Envelopes and letters Signed SLA | directed to ABC, CBS and NBC national news comentatora had 7 typewriting with similar spacing and type style to the ss typewriting on Qy1 and Qk previously submitted, but some possible style differences were observed in the comparison and it was concluded that the typewriting on submitted items was not. prepared by any of the typewriters used to prepare other items ~" - submiftted in this case and the other cases noted above. The ° - 3 typewriting on Q1i7 is a similar size and type style to the’ oa questioned typewriting on Q20 through Q23 and Q32 through Q39 ‘ a submitted in this case, Q16 and 017 in the ASGM case and Q28.-.’ and Q29 in the SLA case, but a definite conclusion was not. - reached whether these items were prepared by the same typewriter. See QlUy6 through Q1u9 for other comparisons but no definite This document contains neither recommendations gor conclusions of the FB], It ts the property of the PBI end ia loaned to your agency: it aod its contents ae not to be distributed outside your agency. ‘ ‘tw U. & GOVERNMENT PHONTING OFFICE: 1970 © - 408-8400 Iz, eas 6 ote ey Fy Sager ee lf + Ta 3, G .