◆ SpookStack

ees + ' . . « . - - . . . a Laer ves ~ ° i Pa 2 ra ae g BAC, San Francisco’ 08088 a 15, 1974 2 Latent fingerprint not identica] fingerprints individ- a ' wals previously named for comparison purposes in captioned case 2 and in Bufile #157-30832, San Francisco file #157-9806, and Bufile #157-30190, San Francisco file #157-9412, - re : f a tet . Latent print compared with latent prints previously)“ mop _ reported and remaining unidentified in captioned case and in the a two aforementioned cases, but no identification effected. Conclusive comparisons not possible, inasmuch as comparable areas not . present in all instances, ° Le Search conducted through appropriate sections of — - Single fingerprint file, _but no identification effected, aT woe . Disposition of Q126 and Q127 will be furnished in the: - separate Laboratory report. Lifts of no value destroyed. Remaining ro -8pecimens enclosed, .. 3: ee ; ; - £ . . at . . 5 . ‘ a - ‘ shen t 7 : a . ¢ “ "25 a & : ra . x? 7 - ~ m~, us ‘ e “ hoe va a , # a a "4 a . SY t+ ‘ ost = 4 * ‘> ‘ ope = . ’ en . - . wo fay f) wo ryt ” Py . : ~ “ ; . Tae 4 re : . ae ‘ a : Ve we os atu “3 ‘ _ . s 4g. ~ two ik = . 4 a eS ye, < ; “ ae on : is? ‘ - “pt 2 . ate! “nie .. ’ = wo ar ne setae . FO Cae id