Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 10
Page 44
44 / 454
y
Memorandum to Mr. E. S. Miller e
RE: ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE FOR INTELLIGENCE
; PURPOSES ON THE SYMBIONESE LIBERATION ARMY
(SLA) IN THE PATRICIA HEARST CASE
Our action in this test case may be referred to
as precedent or as guidance in subsequent consideration by
courts or Congress. If we seek to limit application dis-
closure to ore jurisdiction we should apply to the USDC,
D. C., since it was suggested by the Supreme Court in
Keith, Limiting this procedure to one USDC would be bene-
ficial in that a uniform policy could be developed, which
would give us fairly good guidelines in considering whether
or not to make an application in a particular case in the
future.
(Additionally, I think we might well expect a
warrant requirement even for our foreign counterintelligence
electronic surveillances in the future. Any precedent which
could serve to limit the required disclosure in those cases
to only one court should definitely be established).
If the court feels it must pass on our application
for surveillance, as indeed it must under Keith, but feels
that it lacks standards and procedures under which to deter-
mine the validity of our application, and therefore refuses
to approve or deny our application, we should petition the
Circuit Court of Appeals for a writ or mandamus ordering
the District Court to act. If the Court of Appeals refuses
to do this, we shonid petition the Supreme Court for a writ.
Since approval or denial of a warrant is @ matter within
the discretion of the USDC based on the facts presented to him
we will not be appealing his decision; but rather, in the
absence of his decision, we will be requesting an order from
@ superior court directing him to act, one way or the other
it.e., approve or deny the application.
In this manner we will get our surveillance or
bring to a head the void in the law created by Keith, and
perhaps spur Congress to action in providing a warrant or
judicial review mechanism for domestic intelligence electronic
surveillaaces, .
~7= CONTINUED — OVER
LL ‘ 7
tent Sloot EON TS Sree pepe rat wees ee ee ee eee .
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic