Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
HEARNAP — Part 14
Page 435
435 / 987
Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: HEARNAP
™_
purpose of executing search warrants, but by judicial interpretation :
that statute has been used to measure entries to execute arrest warrants
as well. In summary, Section 3109 authorizes forcible entry into
private premises in order to execute a smrch warrant or to njake an
arrest where: (1) the officer has the authority to make the arrest;
(2) he has reasonable cause to believe the person to be arrested is in
the premises at that time; (3) he gives notice of his authority, purpose
and identity and demands entry and is refused entry by an occupant
of the premises. {
I explained that Bureau policy as stated specificdly in our
manuals is entirely in accord with the law. I pointed out that the
difficulty in individual cases lies in the determination that must be
made by the Agent on the scene as to whether he has at that time
sufficient basis for a reasonable belief that the fugitive is in the
premises to be entered, I said that that requires a subjective determination
by the Agent which obviously can be reviewed by others later who may or
may not disagree with the Agent's judgment.
At that point the Director commented that his concern with
this matter was the publicity being given the incident and the inquiries
being received from Members of Congress and elsewhere. He told the
Attorney General that he was carefully reviewing the facts of this matter
and his full inquiry has not as yet been completed. He said that he intends
to respond to those making inquiry very carefully explaining the Bureau
policy is consistent with the law.
The Attorney General commented that as a resull of my
presentation it appeared that the critical question concerning the matter
in Alexandria was whether or not there was sufficient probable cause to
believe that the fugitive was in the premises. I told the Attorney General
that was the issue.
The Attorney General then opened the matter to questions
from others at the staff conference and the only question raised was
presented by a representative cf the LandsDivision who asked me
whether there was a specific decision that weuld authorize forcible entry
into premises based on an anonymous tip alone. I explained to him that
-2- CONTINUED - OVER
-
-
=
.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic