◆ SpookStack

LE SE a TE, a PULTE LT SOME PLE ie PE ENSEL E 7 COPE T=) a te Y SE aaa ES ee ta sg PS oneal etn eR + : - ., : al ete oe 2 OO ee - te Me ee ee I ee ee ee too clearly how short the steno is ) sited iibtidtanaan, & 5 é failed to secure cempliance with , ” 7 the constitutional nzovisions on C ; a" the part of petice ozficers with © 9% the attendant <Fegulbienat the courts oe 103 ; , under the Sue 8 rine have been con- - 424 ; , stantly requirdiytc Bagticizate in, oy . 124 and in effect condone, éthe lawless , 2s] activities of law enforcement of- \ 14 ficers.° . 15! _ 16) *Courts, which regularly concern themselves with imposing i Se “Oe, . 27: sanctions on individual ‘Violators must be ecvally vigilant when is, ‘confronted with instanedé’ in which the government has violated the 197 law. It is well established that the courts are vested with the 20. power to dismiss an indictment as a “sanction for governmental mis- ai jemoadugt. | United States Ve Heath, 260 fF. 2d 623 (1558); - United es grates Vike mNardolillo, 252 PF, 2a 755 (C.A. 1 1958); cf. Kahn Vv. . SEEPS ann vs i. aa 23: “Secretary 2s Yerith, Education ane fel fare, 53 F, R.D. 241, 244 (D. is, 24! Hassi2971) ; United States v. Seafarers Intesnationat Union, 343 j . 25) F. supp. 779, 784 (£.D.N. Y. 1972}. . 26) , . . " e 27. While the majority of the reported cases involve mis- ah conduct during the prosecutorial shase, there are secent cases in 29) , _ Which governmental misconduct during the investigatory phase con d 2 '30) tributed heavily to a basis for eisnissal. In the Pentagon Papers 31 i case (United ‘States y. Russo, No. 9373-CD-ENB Cc. D. Cal. [1973]}, . 32 the Court ordered a dismissal based cn coverament misconduct which oe ee OT ae on ee mae a PA era SAYER