◆ SpookStack

Rae tee = ae ta Ae rat tt aE Ca Te as i! daw ee ms : i Fe 2 ‘ € Y . “4 - eo i ~ 7 i a ai we ENE I TIGATIVE DIVISION .—° EE ee cote Ss saree oe FG ae This concerns the trial of Patricia Campbell Hearst _ ae in San Francisco, California, on 3/4/76. ' Attached advises Judge Carter ruled against suppres- sion motion by the defense and stated he would allow in |. evidence certain items seized from 288 Precita Street. - * Judged Carter based his decision on Hearst's lack of standing to object to any illegality on the searct a explaining that Hearst had no proprietary or possessory™: itemst at 288 Precita and had denied ever entering Sy, S 288 Precita. Defense objected to admission of two ‘ay documents based on prejudice: (1) A diagram of the Marysville Avenue Branch, Bank of America, in Sacramento, California, which contained two lines of handwriting identified with Patricia Hearst, “ and (2) a document entitled "Bakery" comprising of a . list of preparations for a bank robbery. Judge Carter = concurred with defense and suppresséd.item number one | and denied motion to suppress item’ number ‘two. - Doctor Rodd W. Perry, intern onsduty,? San Francisco General Hospital, testified he treatéd young lady on --- 8/12/75, for poison oak but was not able to,identify~ + « Hearst as the person he examined on that ‘occasion since patient's face was badly swollen. Judge Carter, admitted into evidence by stipulation several items including apparent manuscripts for a book on the SLA, writings on militant feminism, shopping list for items which could - constitute bomb components, and pages of political rhetoric. Judge Carter ‘strongly urged U. S. Attorney James L. Browning, Jr., to%proceed with the introduction of evidence at 9:30 a.m., 3/5/76 . - Mr. Callahan /~ | : G [Kor 1 1 - Mr. Mintz 1 1 - Nee Hea F 4 Fhe 1 Yen, mae fe, eS . ioe ia a oe <i tot eg eR tat 5 Sys a8 eS