◆ SpookStack

seit ate Mal ols Paver a~aZsd GENE ESTIGATIVE DIVISION. conn, SNAP '@¢ This concerns the trial of Patricia Campbell Hearst in a ‘San Francisco, California, on 3/9/76. z F. Lee Bailey (defense attorney) continued his cross-examina—~ tion of Doctor Joel Fort (criminologist and physician) regarding his past testimony that he (Fort) had been qualified and called. im 270 cg@sés over thé last 17 years. Bailey cross-examined Fort reg§rding the fees he expected to receive from -he*Govern- . « ment. ‘grt testified that he had "saved" Lenny Br ce “Exomjail -: stating Bhat Lenny Bruce was not a drug addict at the, tiie. FoFt, had examined him. Bailey attempted to discredit Fort ‘by - ‘shows ing that Bruce was subsequently sentenced to ten years Gin "4 prison. . ss Jury was excused so that arguments could be heard regarashg - motion to quash subpoena of Herrick Hospital records where Doctor Fort served as resident 19 years ago. Judge Carter oy at denied admission concurring they were tooxnremote in time to be . Significant. . Judge Carter allowed Bailey | to,make an offer of proof for purpose of record and Baile: indicated such records showed allegations that Fort had "a scattered and sporatic interest in psychiatry," was an “excellent psychiatrist but . ‘lacking as a psychoanalyst," that "he attempts: .to manipulate the staff". and that he was "insensitive to rieeds: of patients." U. S. Attorney Browning pointed out numerous” laudatory and — commendatory entries and the fact that Fort enjoyed three years . .at Merrick Hospital after his internship. Bailey cross examined Fort regarding tape of lecture entitled "Minds on Trial" wherein Fort was extremely critical Of, American judicial system. Bailey asked Fort if he “had “been dropped from the American | Psychiatric Association and thie, Northern California Psychiatric . »- Association. Fort stated he voluntarily left both associations. —-- Fort testified that he was never,.fired by the World Health Organization and United Nations. Fort admitted being fired by San Francisco County because his views were too independent from those of the police and other health officials. Fort admitted telling the Hearst Family that some disadvantages and injuries mightaccrue to the defendant because of a public trial and that every ‘possibility of avoiding a public trial should be exploréd. Fort was asked if he told Mrs. Hearst that she should consult “a, third party because Bailey wants publicity. .and Browning wantSya Judgeship. Fort indicated that he had not so stated to Mrs.,Hearst and said that Mrs. Hearst herself “May have said something to that effect. oe ot .Trial to reconvene at 10:00 a. Mes. 3/10/76. “1 seMr. Callahan : 1 ~ Mr. Mintz A 1p . Adams” - 1 - Mr. Moore - tyfypeavitt tte g yor ese 28