◆ SpookStack

7-126 (Rev. 10-6-75) ob so a . -. ot 7 wet, ee OFHONAL FORM MO. 1D P= se Lon no Ce RAY 0952 EDITION wey ' é : . ret rs: GAA Fred (41 Cem 1O1T11.8 i , _ my - UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ; oe = : aisse0%. . . : ; . Admin. . Comp. Syat, DATE: 3/8/76 _ _ Files & Cop _ Ri - . Ident, COMMITMENT neha “= ins oe jatell. Section yn Do ocu ments 1h? _ | begal Cave, —_ mS ‘* Plan. & Eval. — . s _ Spec. Inv. rea ; Oy yO + Telephone Ren, - Director Sec'y —_ 25 File#_7-15200 Examiner/s Symbol/s 20 Man Workdays 35 Court/Agency 05 Date/s 4 er 50 ) City & State San’ Francisco 77 Testified | &) Yes 1{7] Yes © ] Yes, California [J No I No [ 1 PNe —s 79 Reason: 01. Guilty Plea ; 05. Testimony Not Needed ‘ 02. Cace Continued _ - 06. Mistrial 03. Case Dismissed . 07. 04. Stipulation P “17 Miscellaneous Commitments: (MC) . = 99 Reason: O1. Lecture/Training (Others). . 5, Field Examination of Evidence 02. Training (Self) a “06. Research/Data Acquisition . 03. Speech - “07. 04. Pretrial Conference | . 08. Investigative Support — . 09. Communication Support Results of Trial. Pag F. Lee Bailey _ Defense Attorney : SSE 2EO°9 - Gillham testified during-froseeution rebuttal that twenty to twenty-five documents entered in evidence contained the writing of Patricia Campbell Hearst. The writings “on these documents described Hearst's feminists views, her radical political . Putlook (the "Tania Interview") and even contained apparent partial instructions for f# construction of a bomb. This evidence was considered important in rebuttal as they a ‘Wwere:prepared after the defendant's kidnaping and tend to portray her asa \ free- ‘minded person as opposed to the defense contentifWthat-Hearst was al alltime mativated by fear. Gillham furnished direct testimony ToP BBBOt. Mfrty min i derwent cross-examination for about ten riinutes. 6 $) 376 oy es Se wes ext PRS eee eee ae i des Sah = Lea Tae tee Pree! ea ees an p g a a rer ee, So eh - 2 ae a ade Psa eee eee aes a x pre se our i ye SS <x) “yt a Se Ne ane aed eit eee