◆ SpookStack

oe . ” . -"- . . cp tae vee , oe . am, ‘ . we a en te me ae a cm me a eg ek ee ee ee ee ee ee # arrive in fifteen minutes to purchase the tickets, Upon their ar- : 7 Se, rival at the store, Jack and Hicki Scott were% mek; aby be a. agents” . . Re .who served them with subpoenas. eontby, in : % - URE Me Fee metittet Rane a ee bet ee = the form of a sworn affidavit. o oO & ta “2 Jack Scott-was also suspected of harboring ¢ the defendants © in the instent case. He was fabs jecteg to continuous F.B.i. har~ 0 In one instence he was ap- ed oO ~~ . Ye FREES AMR GSTS SER eRe fe LT ER Et ERE Ty Me aha Eth FA ate A LE ak Pe A nee ~* 2 . ad 2istol in a manner which Hr. Scott interpreted as constituting a threat. Mr. Scott's allegations with respect to phone taps are supported Land we by impressive evidence showing the F.B.I. to have acted on the: 4 =) eb basis of information which could have been known oniv through moni toring his Prone Tais information is presented -in state---- is 1G... » J 4. CASS JACKSON. Hr. Jackson was a football coach at Oberlin Collese in, on March io, 1975, he was approached by F.B.I. | estioned him for three hours. They implied that if He was also threatened with prosecution as an “accomplice in the Hearst case" if he snowed any further friendship toward Jack Scott or his wife Micki. This information is contained in a sworn affi- me S$. LINDA HUEY. Ms. Huey was visitcd at home and questioned at length oo concerning the Scotts, the Harrisos, and Patricia Hearst. A ‘” strong presumption of illegal tapping of Ms. iucy's teleshone is