◆ SpookStack

*ansmit tind. a to “r, Adams > LOS AICHLES TRIAL Cr WILLIAM AUD EMILY wad “neither Puarst or the Horrines “had Gon e for ap ey [11/2 years without indication of vielence on. thair bart, | “£ven Lf-the Judge was correct {in this statement, which he, _. Waa rot, we con find no law aupportive of the feet that . "a pereon who has avoided aporehension following the “commission of a violent erinme (3) must be assuned te have )..-. given up his vielent propensitic# BE the period Following ao _the commission of the violent. FF ipa exgords 1 3/2 years. : Hotwithatanding the ahovay’ there are numerous “. eases which may be cited. in suprert of, principle that law | -enforcenent officera may enter a awalling without a search | _, Warrant for the purpose of making an arrest if there . ee probable cause to believe that the pérsen sounht to be varrent ted is in the dwelling, and the existanes of exigent / Gircumstances demand that action ba taken immediately as _ Opposed to delaying/tha entry for purpose of obtaining a-- .-: ecarch warrant. Sea, fH Donald vw. United States, 335 U.S. - 452 (1943); Warden ve “Hayden, 387 G65. 294 “{1S67) ; Vorsan — oe met ete em arrears ow, United Statas, $35 S Fin 2nagss (D.C. Cir. 1970); ‘Salvador SE Fr ee ee ee ee v. United States, 505 F. 24 1348 (8th Cir. 1974); ana . United States vo williams, 385 F. Supp. 1490 (E.D. Nich. 1994p. Particular attention should ie paid tc a California case, People v. Hill, 528 P. 2221 (1974), which noted that : *. police officers, unGer California Statute, are justifies ino, entering-® closed residence in order to sake an arrest if . the officers ‘have reasonablic grounds to believe that the: “person ito. bévarrested is insieée the residence and if the ee officers. have denanded acmittance and exvlained thes PUTPOBE. for which® sbhesatnittance 43 sought. Seo also, -in this Sarre _ connection, “Hiller v. United States, 357 U.S. 3061 (1958), 7. set forth in” Vol. 1, ‘Manual of Instructions, Section Be Soma » page 3a ‘attached. 7 Pepe. Under tho’ facts, as relayed | ‘to Sh by ae SA Schreiber, Judge Brandlertea ruling of 3/1776 is fare "ugorrect under both Federal and California law. oo é r fe fa | . — Cabana a a Pe lag ie Hones. For information.”