◆ SpookStack

a ne a ; Srscane: 7S. ee: “wrienesses uve —— me, ont AE tao auapeenas eee os —™ i “were Sased on inf ormation ootained fr rec iL iegal e2 Zectronic a, Pome sane! “suryeiilance, “and the goverament has denied any ‘conczetioa wit Ape eT as ee oe ate ead ie me moe _ e : ae, —_ ere tr oe er ee ee . pee the subpoenas and electronic surveilianca of any t sind .i mesa: bd ne Sm ee z Savatage br at ‘the outset, before analyzing the ata con- | F tentions, and representations of the parties, ‘it wii be vel oe ache mma apatnaaringth renal ry ot Rita oe m Hline Rl earaet 5 aah 2 Weim + ' L. ante Vado s pod ro pur this case in proper. perspective, ‘This is not a noraal “rout ine inves c igat awe case o£ Limited interest seveiiing = efforts, The “patty Hearst case ‘waroused uaususk sad nation= iz oe wide interest ‘and concern that. exerted an undue amount of - : TG a public pressure on the government to ‘apprehend Miss Hearst an her Symbionese Liberation arny cepters, This pressure eo ss nee Ane ~— i dosbtedly stimulated epecial Law enforcement efforts to Locate! Ry ? her, including the possible participation of agencies in acai _ i tien, to the FBI. “Under” these circumstances, the possibility; | that extraordinary measures such as electronic aucveitiance ae _) ee { vase inabua of tha nature and | peope Sof this case, (as wetl i as of tha goute S responsibility under Section 3504 to deter- {wine whether’ ‘proceedings have been tainted by fllagal elec- tronic surveillance, see infra, it would seem that the govern ranranevbren neat nn nnen anther hl etn it et Aho af went? Ss. response should be as unambiguous, unequivocal and ze- iable as reasonably possible, and should be more. dispositive ztraordinary. case. in the Us ual case phich does (Rok have an; f $ obythe possibility of electronic surve illacce than in. a less | 2 4 - “| stantFtcance extending beyond this district, the at fidavit fof, the 2 U»_S +, Attomey ad.the EB ke. Bt. Spent an charae ek the