◆ SpookStack

Ate ToS 7 { } ie ie ee} . on He ee Lek EMILY HARRIS, WILLIAM HARRIS, PLAINTIFFS VERSES CHARLES W. BATES; ET AL DEFENDANTS CV 76 0034 Filed U.S. District Court Central’ District of California 2 ene Sikiaey or in anyway infringed or impaired the plaintiffs rights to a fair and impartial trial on the charges pending against them. Defendant is without sufficient information on which to base an answer to the allepations contained in plaintiffs' paragraphs 39-45 as they apply to the other named defendants in this natter. 46. Defendant is without: sufficient information on which to base an answer to the allegations contained . in plaintiffs’ paragraph 46. 47-49, Defendant Gebhardt incorporates by reference | his responses set forth in paragraphs eight, 39-45 of this answer. Ne denies that the release “of "information as admitted in paragraphs 39-45 of this answer was done with the specific intent of arousing public prejudice against the plaintiffs. Defendant further denies that he acted in concert with any other of the named defendants to effectuate the purposes alleged by plaintiffs' paragraphs 47-49. Defendant is without sufficient information on ; which to base an answer to the remainder of the allegations ad contained in plaintiffs' paragraphs 47-49 as they apply to him. Defendant is without sufficient information on which to base an answer to the allegations in plaintiffs’ paragraphs sena9 as they apply to the other named defendants. 50 (a). Tis paragraph contains no allegations of fact which require a response from defendant Gebhardt but insofar as any facts are alleged which could conceiv- ably be applied to defendant Gebhardt, those allegations are denied. (b). This paragraph contains no allegations of i ae - fagt which require a response from defendant Gebhardt 4 aan bug insofar as any facts are alleged which could conceiv- Gs. abiy be applied to defendant Gebhardt, those allegations eo are denied. we ey ene prep ere oe perm en ers ya