◆ SpookStack

58. ‘Said contents or portions thereof described in pare- pes vee o¢ Se a te Se tee ee en eee 3 ow rd graph 57 above ‘have been ‘released, leaked, or disseminated to the general public by officers, ‘agents, ana employees Of the FE ‘Los Angeles Police Department, Ingelwood Police Department, the Los . Angeles District ‘Attorney’ S Office, and ‘the Los Angeles Cou: Sherire' s Department. The resulting releases, leaks, and. disse ation produced highly prejudicial and incriminating news items o- plaintiffs~including- prominentty-carried-articles:in-theLos ants : 7 Angeles Times. (Exhibit S) Se . ce . tol 59." Defendant Bates publicly deplored said leaks describ: ne np in paragraphs 57 and 58 above.” pee ene ae 12! 60. Attorneys, officers, and employees of the Ls Angele. 13], District Attorney* 's Office and Anvestigators, ‘officers ‘and ca 14% employees of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in San “prdncs: pe 15| and Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, and Los Angeles 16° County Sheriff' s Department, released or leaked information to 7); the general public which. stated that between 12 and 20 witnesse: : Iwould] be called before the Grand Jury including William ‘Huett, 7 three. of his employees, ‘Thomas. Dean Matthews,. and, Frank. ‘Sutter. ; The resulting release or “Leak produced news items including a | prominently . carried article ‘in the Los Angeles: Times under, a ! headline entitle “LA Jury Indicts Patty, Harrises on. AL Coug Es i which guoted: and. ‘summarized the alleged statements. giver to" " defendants and their. investigators by said witnesses. _ (Exhibit & eo gooas era ‘Defendant. ‘Stevenson, ‘stated publicly: that: an. article i published in ‘the Roliing: ‘Skene “sn ‘October 25; “1975, entitled | Ge. mate oa ae : arn LO ele ‘The. Inside, Story" was” "essentially corrgct." _femnapie wy Saia & ao ome < “7 ack ‘to. the alléged. ctininal. ‘conduct 'f ets have been indicted with ‘respect’ to theis’ Patlsea personal rer eRComS eer ot. et a