◆ SpookStack

we ee ee ein te oe nae eda i A re de ae cee mone abe eae a mere tet: Lene, oak pevemey ate. meee tee ett pha” ep nd De oh Re ee aet gt eal ie Pa "ve ates «RG eg er AOA Soke Ss eee SATE. fare we “=, : . 7 oT, BES ote ae! ty <x: few The questioned typevriting on the pagcse beginning SPAN oooe” "1. Gate opens enee” "Key pees” °EVELLE J. YOUNGER: © eo» and “one electric ..." was prepared ky the typewriter used . to prepare K119. 92097 "rhe conclusion was reached that the typevriting or the three pages beginning | "NOTES * HEW .e+,” “NOTES « FOUNDATIONS - ‘eee” and "conduct pop ..." 48 the sare size and style as the | typewriting on K118, previously submitted; however, éue to the “lack of sufficient individual daentifying characteristics, a ~ definite conclusion was not reached whether these fiters were prepared by the typewriter used to prepare Ki1l8. The tyre- writing on these three pages was not prepared by the tyre- writer used to prepare K119. . 02088 a . The questioned typewritina on the typeuritten page . beginning "ACTIONS IN SUPPORT ...” is the sane size and style 7 ee _ as the KX1218 typewriting; however, due to the lack of sufficient Bisg(. - -ndividual identifying characteristics, a Gefinite conclusion . .- --: "was not reached whether this typewritina wes prepared by the — Soule. typewriter used to prepare Kll1é. Thie queationed typewriting os was not prepared by the typewriter used “in preparation of Fils. . WRITING COMPARISONS - 92087" , a, " “the conclusion was reached that the questioned - hanéwriting on both sides of the page with writing beginning "B of A Marysville,” except the two lines of writing at the of the front side Leginning “saw 7 employees ..." epared by EMILY HARRIS, F5, KG, KB, 19, K20 and K37. « . - 4 ‘ = TET an a i Soares = Sores Tete _ _ a =~ “Ytover) — = ES I eS ALA LS ee eee er en cS " b ~ ea ov ar ear, - . . . . . . on . MS . .” .- ~ . 7 ' eo