◆ SpookStack

Arte = —_ THIS IS A COPY*** THIS IS A COPY****THIS IS A COPYe##sTHIS I3 A COPY*#ae 3isters and brothers of the Bay Area Research Collective (DRAGON) and the New Dawn Coilective (The People United). Wo are the Peovles Intelligence Unit, Future Forces, of the New world Liberation Front. For now our prime nurneose is to analyze the develonme of any/all vrincinled a ternative information sources. We share @ commo’ ideology of all units of the New World Liberation Front. Our concern is the potential develonment of ift between NDC and BAR that wo must seck to avoid. We fully sunnort tiie develooment of vrincin peonles communications bases by BARC and NDC. Wa would like to offer ou analysis and information so both collectives and the veorle can be bette informed. our analysis-intormation followse Issue #17 of the Peovle United {pge 15} contained a letter about BARC we must strongly suggest that this letter be considered as unnrincinvled. We are weary of those who would otter sunnort md or criticism as if the were conrnds, and at the same time manifest onpressive sub igete idgo- logies--un*rincinled ideolory. We cannot accent sunrort o Pocriticisna wh given in such an onnreassive versvectiveés "crazed chick" and “into underground destruction"({as if this individuals goal were objectivity) when cloarly this individuals analysis was subjective and unnrinciniad. we ask NDC to clarify its particular reagona (if any) for nrinting that letter? Also why the annarent reply(?} following that letter seemed to be our of context with the information given to the neonle? wo now offer this additional information to the neonle for informatic analysis, seme of which will be sneculative nrojection. A few duys after the rally of May 18, 1975, vhich was co-snonsored b: BARS, Url, alld O of A, a Letter anpearod in the Daily Cel entitiead "Rad: cal énic" by an individual who's criticism now forms a familiar '!nattern. The exumpie we have given alan. follows such a fpatternt, This 'nattern follows the dynamics of subjective analysis, such &8 verbal (subjective: trashing and insinuations beyond any concent of comradly sunvort. We raise these thoories reguarding this toattern’, l, This 'nattern! may be only relative to our imaginations as un- founded sneculatione 2, It is just an {nBerent characteristic of subjective analysiss 34. It is vnart of a continuing attack by nig forces to sow division and alienetion-isolation amongst USe 4. That are the tirst three theories are surely factors, put thet t third theory in narticular must be given particular consideration. would now like to »oint out that there are snecific stratiric advan- tares in having more than one srincinled communication source. 1. With a vrotracted war in mind, a milti-based communication base | will better survive nig attacks and continue to serve the needs of One pressed veorle 2, Also each segment of the base can give comradly sunvort/critictes | self-criticism to the others us a chock on objectivity, theory, strater - ete. in bringing intormation to the neonlese eagons as area or cultural versnective, anec: . 3. Por certain r » such AIMAMAIA/ BET PRE /IBRAMA LY BY LANA / BARE /LLL/ BE /ABEO/ A sevments of the communications base wt more accesabdle by certain underground and aboveground organizations and inaividuals, than would be another segment or a single base.