◆ SpookStack

mos aes PN a Sag SAAB op TS Star ib Like eae ae 7 a Oi sprtl 16, 1963, © shack sis made with the, tion and ee ‘ mtwatisation Service, los Angeles, California, to ascertain the cature of » circumstances under which Subject was permitted entzy into the United States -. for t residence. The files of Sie above service disclosed tit |” o : MES) was aduitted into the United states on October 22, 1948 ates | @& Repequota immigrant, his vies being granted wiler fection 4 (D)o Subject... wes granted a non-~quota status inasmach as he claimed te be a prefeseor of . 2" qusie and to have been employed in this cecwation for two years iumedistely /. prior to his application for an immigration vies. Subject gave the MEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, Inckefeller Foundsti Mew Tork City, ae his : during that period. It was noted from the tion file en Subject |: _ (0541/47) that Subject's wife LUISE was granted o visa of the sane type tained hy her, husband and was admitted with him on the meme dates o ‘prior to the granting of the above visas, hovever, 8 _T 7 placed ‘iinderx-oxths—06 the basis of information obtained st this hearings the Tumigration Board decided against the issuance of non-qucta visas for Subject and his wife. ‘the transcript of the above hearing was subsitted to the Board . of Appeal in Washington, however, and Subject and wife were subsequently granted the vieas for which they had applied, NAPARTE, whose rep= ~ : wtation, it appears, bas been questioned by the Tunigration ani Maturalisation Service, acted as Immigration counsel for Subject prior to the time hiscase | was referred to the Board of Appeal at Washington. A note contained in the - imal gration file indicated that LEO TAUB, 521 Fifth Avenus, Mew York City, . ~ as attorney for Subject when his case was appealed. ‘this note te indicated that TAUB was to fly to Washington from New York to handle Subject's cARte -_ aA onpy of the transcript of the testimony given ty Subject end his wife could not be furnished to this office at the time the Denigration © Bo “LA file was examined by the writer. ‘the transcript was examined, however, aad & copy will be obtained at a later date, since it appears that Subject and . his wife made statexents under cath which do net coincide ie information - Seorelene’ An the course of this investigations Oe: : ORE ge ca ae * # ect stated ‘inder oath ‘eat he wes not a Communi st and, ae aa Set eeetion.. et appears that the Deni gration and atoralisetics . crvioe bad certain doubts along this line and Subject wes asked about the © nature of "DIE MASSNAHME", for which Subject wrote the music. Subject referred to this play as "The Expedient® (the title has otherwise translated as *The Disciplinary Measure"), and ieee thinae a complete teamietna at but that it concerned the unification of China. A complete a of “ghd the Game wes svumarised in reference — Los Angeles, dated March 30, 1943. Tis play — vacates world revolution and openly identifies itself with Communiam, with on eer eee rie _Teaneyénrit eee i