Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Henry a Wallace — Part 1
Page 198
198 / 228
——
aod ws
a
a
oe ines
.
4
+
'
7
a
F
?
y
7
i
i
4
APRIL 14,1947. 5
There is big money in the system.
The movie companies have found prof-
its can go up even when the number of
Pictures is cut down. In 1941, 353 fea-
tures were released by seven of the eight
major companies and the net profit
after taxes for all operations—produc-
_. tion, distribution and exhibition—totaled
$35,491,000. In 1946, the total annual
output of the seven had dwindled to
232 pictures, and estimated net profits,
with booming theatre attendance, had
climbed to $123.7 million. It pays to
starve the market. And since the market
itself was controlled as outlined above,
the exhibitor used to have no recourse
to fresh sources of supply. He still
doesn’t—but relief is in sight.
The o pening gun
TY WAS this system that William
Goldman tackled, with full knowl-
edge of what he was getting into. He
prepared for it by building up a small
chain of neighborhood houses in
Philadelphia and outlying towns, which
together supplied him with a tidy kitty
running into six figures annually. He
had one advantage: ini the projected
struggié—He' knew, “as an associate said,
“where all the bodies were buried.” Six
years as head of the Warner circuit in
eastern Pennsylvania had given him a
clear understanding of how the other
side worked. In St. Louis, before coming
to Philadelphia in 1928, he had built up
two successive theatre chains, had
fought against and then worked with
the Skouras brothers (Spyros Skouras
now heads Twentieth Century-Fox), and
had put in some time as chain manager
for Paramount. He was a seasoned war-
rior.
The kickoff came in 1940, At that
time, Warner Brothers was having one
of its periodic spats with Paramount
Pictures over treatment of Paramount's
product in Philadelphia. Paramount then
had a backlog of almost a year's un-
played pictures waiting to get into the
area. Goldman extracted a promise from
Neil Agnew, Paramount executive, that
Goldman could get Paramount features
first-run if he could find a good theatre
for them, Goldman forthwith started
negotiations for the Erlanger, a vast and
luxurious amusement hall closed during
most of the depression,
NUMBER OF FEATURES RELEASED
tL
But in the meantime Warner Brothers
had got wind of the deal. According to
Goldman's testimony in the subsequent
trial, Harry Warner got into a huddle
with Barney Balaban, president of Para-
mount, and told him a break in Phila-
delphia would mean a break throughout
the United States. As a’ result, Gold-
man testified, Paramount and Warners
patched up their differences, leaving
Goldman with a theatre and no pictures.
During 1941 and most of 1942 Gold-
tan bombarded the distributors with
letters, telegrams, phone calls and visits
in an effort to get first-run shows for
the Erlanger. He was consistently turned
down by all the exchanges.
“As you know,” wrote Charles
Zagrans, RKO's branch manager, in 2
typical refusal on October 28, 1941,
“Warner Brothers has been our estab-
lished customer for the exhibition of
our pictures first-run downtown Phila-
delphia.” He went on to say that there-
fore RKO would continue to deal with
Warner Brothers “as ia the past.”
Earlier, and Jess formally, Zagrans
put it in a nutshell for Goldman during
a luncheon conversation, aconcding to
Goldman's testimony. “Well, Bill,” be
said, “there is no use kidding you. You
know what the setup is. If we make a
deal with you, Warners will penalize
us in the subsequent-run theatres, and
CCECUCs |) iam
FUCCEEEC Cc FEE:
CUCU AE
CUCU EL
CUCU SEL
LARERERA RAR
in his heart—and in his files—and on ne
NET PROFITS AFTER TAXES (la Millions) <
Charts by Grophics Institute, N.Y.C. $2)
os
A
that will be very harmful to our in-<
terests,’” Fs
Goldman treasured all these things: |
‘wei,
December 8, 1912, sprang his big play. 4
He filed suit against the cight big pro- ;
ducer-distributors and their exhibitor:
affiliates in the Philadelphia area, asking” ’
$1,350,000 in triple damages for loss”
of profits at the Erlanger during two
years. The suit charged that the Erlanger ‘:
bad been refused permission to exhibit.
first-run pictures “by reason of an illegal *
combination and conspiracy to monopo- :
lize the entire motion-picture industry, ©
particularly in the Philadelphia district.” -
Goldman's extensive, if unproductive,
letter writing, of the previous two years . -
now showed its value. He was able to “|
produce in court almost identical letters :
from local representatives of the big «,
producer-distributors, denying him films ©
at a time when there were films to buen, ©
films drying up in the vaults because of |:
the first-run bottleneck maintained aod
enforced by Warner Brothers.
On April 8, 1944, Federal Judge ‘
William £1. Kirkpatrick of the US Dis- :
trict Couit dismissed the case. “While -
Warner Brothers undoubtedly has a
monopoly in the Philadelphia area in |’
the showing of Grst-run pictures,” he
tuled, “the monopoly is not illegal.” 3 2
Goldman appealed—but He was uot | Me
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic