Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Hindenburg — Part 1
Page 78
78 / 100
mer: 9 re
HILL
vied ab D2 Dy 2 nila
re wee ee ee
tm oe
C Sederal Bureau of Investigation
* United States Bepartment of Justice “Kx Dawes oon
936 Raymond-Commerce Building aay,
Newark, New Jersey “em
May 11, 1937.
SG eATAT AAO Tne Tat DMIDaAStrlPiry Ev £f/ st Lt
ND ~SORitanacLcoldiede - hat 5 acts
Direstor,
Federal Bureau of Investigation,
p Washington, D. ¢.
Am oO
Re: ATRSHIP HINDENBURG.
Dear Sir;
Cg
re [ In connection with the activity of the Newark office
as to the disaster ocourring in sonneotion with the airship
Hindenburg on May 6, 1957, thee is attached hereto, for the
information of the Bureau, outline of the activity to date.
We. Se Devereaux of May 11, 1937, and the memorandum of myself,
submitted as of May 11, 1937, and joint memorandum of Special
Agente in Charge R. E. "yetterli and W. 5. Devereaux which, in
substance, covers the activity of the Newark office to date.
, This is covered in the memorandum of Special agent in Charge
L
Reference is made to the suggested or contemplated
inquiry by Colonel}Hartney and Roger fWilliamson as stated by
the latter to the tffeot that they wire considering a search
of the terrain inside the reservation fer anything which would
indicate the cause of the disaster to the Hindenburg. As stated
in my conversation with Mr. Foxworth the travel of the airship on
the afternoon of May 6, 1937 in the vicinity of the Waval air
Station would make an inquiry of such limited mature of little
walus. It is to be recailed that the ship was flying in the
vicinity of the Naval air Station for possibly two hours or more
before it landed, and any direct action taken towards the ship
from the ground could just as well have ocourred anywhere within
an ares of possibly fifty equare miles, more or less. In fact,
4% i6 my personel opinion that possibly any action, if it ocourred,
would have been by some person outside of the reservation rather
than by somebody entering the reservation grounds for this pur-
pose. It is to be noted particularly that numerous spectators
surrounded the field in expectation of the landing of the Hinden-
burg on this date. any direct action, of course, would have been
subject to possible observation by the numerous spectators if it
had occurred within the immediate vicinity of where the ship was
landing. epee weaker renner amen eo TE
RECORDED & INDEXE TE - 44 GO-
: _f NON ‘ 7 7 ? 9
(pycinbr f | “Trepeetor. 2 eg
Bole. 19 Wh So Sf
, _ vo 2 , Lo
| ee ¥ pote
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic