Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Hindenburg — Part 3
Page 46
46 / 76
AIR COMMERCE BULLETIN 33
tricity and known as ejectrostatica. In this
froup, there is first mentioned a possibil-
fy due to the nature of the materiats
employed.
In the older of cell fabric, contain-
Ing a rubberized element, ft was apparently
possible to create a static spark by tearing
the fabric. The cell fabrie used in the
Hindenburg, as far as we cou'ld learn, did
net include material possessing thia char-
acteristic. Since virtually all of the cells
Were copsumed by the fire, no test could Be
made of the cell fabric.
. ’
The two bungeeg in the stern of the ship
connected to the horjzontal membera of the
tell, contained some rubber, but ag fur as
we know the bungees had not been damaged
until after the fire had broken ou
Before proceeding further withthe sub-
dect of electrostatics, 1t 19 to be remarked
that an airship as a body te regarded as
carrying an electric charge, the nature and
extent of which depend upon the circum-
stances. In motion it may aceumulete a
charge either through friction with the air
or perbaps by mesns of charged water drops
such as may be found in clowds or mist.
It may accumulate a charge of either posl-
tive or negative sign, Thunder clouds may
carry a positive or a negative sign. Ac.
cording to the evidence in this instance,
the ship is assumed to have carried a post-
tive charge on Ita outer surface, which ja &
semiconductor. This phenomenon is due to
the fact that an airship in flight ia within
the atmosphere which is electrified. A few
of the more interesting features of this
befomenon are; that the earth ordinarily
a charged negatively; that in the’ atmos-
phere there is an electrical field measured
in volts per meter (potential gradtenti
which in fine weather amounts ta 100 volts
per meter, becoming higher as the weather
ows Inore disturbed; that the tendency
8 for an equalization current to pasa from
the atmosphere to the ground; thit the
electrical conductivity of the atmosphere
is greater when the atmosphere is humid.
Other facts and assumptions are that the
total outer surface of the ship haa a uniform
potentia'; that the electrostatic effects on
the outside of the sbip are separate and
apart from those on the inside: that a
number of conditions tend to equalize the
potentia! of the ship with the surrounding
atmosphere; among these is the dissipatian
created by the exhaust gases and by the
movement of propellers, the edges of the
latter being metallcally connected with th:
ship's structure; that the landing ropes
would serve as conductors of the ship's
charge and equalize the potential of the
ship with that of the ground, When the
ship is held by the landing ropes the elec-
trostatic picture 1s such that the surface
of the ship after a brief interval, so to
gpenk, becomes a piece of the ground e'e-
vated Into the atmosphere.
The potential differences measured ver-
tleally to the earth are called the potential
gradient. This gradient is higher over those
ereas of the ship where the edges or points
project into the atmosphere, espectally over
he bow and stern of the rhip. It maw he
tncrensed in the presence of charged clouds.
The principal protection agninst an elec-
trostatle discharge which might serve to
ignite an inflammable mixture in or_about
the sh'p is the bonding of the ship, Bri fiy
such bonding is the connecting up of the
many patts of the ship so that electrically
it becomes one complete metallic whole. A
possible test of the state of this bonding
could have been made by detecting throug’
the radio receivers the characteristic noise
associated with interference created by im-
perfect bonding. In the present instance,
ee had been noted, the receiving system of
the ship did not give indication that any
injury ad occurred to the ship's bonding
prior to the accident.
We have also considered the possibility
that due to a discharge between parts of
the ship having different potentials, a spark
might have been created. Whether such
4 discharge occurred we cannot say. <Ac-
‘cording to the testimony, tbe ship was
bond in keeping with the best known
practice,
There was one fixture of the sbip in
this reapect that received more than pass-
ing notice—the unbonded electric wires at
the stern_ electric Jamp of the airship,
Witness Dieckmann indicated that there
might have been a static charge produced
by this tail light wiring at the light bulb
since the wirlag within it was the only part
of the ship which did not have the game
potential ag the remaining surface of the
whip, a very singll difference, however.
Whether such a small electrostatic capacity
as the lamp terminal would have been able
to produce a spark is highly questionable.
Another reason to regard it as improbable
ig that no one reported having seen the
origin of the fre at the extreme rear end
of the ship.
BALL LIGHTNING
A reading of the record reveals that
some space is given to another manifests-
tiun of electrostatic discharge; namely, to
the possibility that ball lightning might
have accounted for the ignition of the
mixture,
Ball lightning fs supposed to be one of
the peculiar species of lightning discharges
that bave been observed from time ta
time. One of itg features ig that lke a
drop of oil on water it spreads and splits
into segments, some of which seginents
continue for a distance along objects on
which ther alight.
Although some authorities have dis-
clatmed the existence of ball Nghtning, we
have considered the idea for what tt might
be worth. It does not very well explain
the slow burping that some of the witnesse<
described as having taken placr at the be-
ginning of the action. Moreover, the
theory as applied in the present instance
would appear to have little substance ginve
no one testified to having observed any
form of Mehtning,
For the same reason any o.her claim
made on the ground of lightning as a
cause would also seem to fail, because none
of the witnesses who testified stated that
they observed any lightning flashes in the
vieinity of the ship or heard an accom-
pacying clap of thunder at the time of
the accident,
B&U8H DISCHARGE, OR ST. ELMO'S FIRE
In order to develop the next possibility
to be considered, viz. ignition due to brush
diacharge, or St. Elmo's fire, a few addi-
tional remarks are necessary upon the
subject of electrostatics and the eonditions
that actually prevailed at the time and
place of the accident,
Tt will be recalled that the bow port
trail ropes first made contact with the ex-
tremely wet ground, 4 minutés before tlie
fire. hen they left the ship they ap-
peared to be quite dry as dust was observed
to fly from them as they descended. These
ropes were made of hemp, The atmosphere
at the time and place of landing was humid
and the ship had abserbed moisture. Tt
wes, therefore. reasonable to suppose that
in the interval the ropes continued 10 ab-
sorb moisture and their conductive qualities
increased. Therefore, their contact with the
gfound under the circumstances would dis-
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Reader
Topic
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic