◆ SpookStack

have branded the statement in Examiner Osx's report as a eharge the same as being malicious fer the reason & te your affies Jobs F. Clark and . UW. W. Grimes, and later in ny pres- mcs, Clark denied having made the etatenent madteined in Rumminer Cox's report and eorroberated the version ef the interview that I had already @iven. This statement ef Clark, given iz the presence of yourself ani Mr, Grimes was entirely voluntary aod was given by Clark before he knew ef my version ef the conference with him. Further, in support ef my @narge that there was malice, if Mr. Cox believed the statement which ie mow incorporated in bis report and had hed mo malice, he most assured ly would have sought both versions ef the interview with Clark, whioh he GiS mot de. Me imoorporated in his report s version alleged to have been Given hy Clark without verifying the same er ednesvoring to ebtain fren me the version of the interview which he later reported to the Assistant Attornsy General. —~" ——— _ -- Respectfully, (Signed) d. 22042 MOOVER. jest She . i i - Be SB T would appreciate your enlitag this ustter te Gr. Ueliat‘s attention as im the mame of common justice this man Oez's report should ve corrected te ascord with the fasts and disciplinary action sheald be _——_ -—--- @ainen against any emplayes ube weld engage in such reprehensible prastices. ——— (Signet) ¢ & &. Te Te em Ore AR a rN pe me prem pe