◆ SpookStack

abeeG fb, ALG ppnop on COn eat awe ee nee een Probate Division HILLORY A. TOLSON, In re: Estate of Clyde A. Tolson, deccased. , Plaintiff v. adoridigeration No. 868-75 OHN P. MOHR, | SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Sép » ao) 4, uy DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION Th xOiRArAQOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THIRSS. YeDEN RULE 34 i, re The plaintiff in this will contest,on September 2, 1975, reparcd and gerved upon defendant a document entitled "Motion , Defendant Rai eR La ” Ys nro” c ith a proposed Order "that said Motion be and the same hereby is granted." , This procedure is completely at variance with Rule 34 f the Superior Court of District of Columbia Civil Rules. That ule states in pertinent part "any party may serve on any other party a request (1) to produce and permit the party making the equest* * *to inspect and copy, any designated documents* * * (b} Procedure * * * The party upon whom the request is served hall serve a written response within thirty days after the ser- ice of the request* * *,* The foregoing Rule itself does not provide for a "Mo- ccordingly it is inappropriate and the defendant objects to any wuling as contemplated in the proposed Order which would grant ion to Produce”, as distinguished from a "Request to Produce". he motion. Defendant will treat the motion as if it were a for Production of Documents and Things Under Rule 34" together : Fd NP ir aT { ' ' ’ we ee ee Se ne 5 ee | ee es