Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John L Lewis — Part 1
Page 17
17 / 79
:
0.
Pe
Re
pisketing — (there are indications that
be subsequently used this injunction to
prevent erganizing by Progressives but |
never used it against activities by the
Tn.
Attempt to recpen January 4, 1938.
(1) His refusal to deal with Progressives, then
tegether with his knowledge of election re-
sults and knowledge United 414 not bave the
personnel to operate amine, might indicate Uni-
ted representatives bad given him assurencse
that they eould get more menbers if he re-
fused to deal with Progressives,
Evidence of Blshoff's refusal to eaploy Progressives
unless they joined United.
(1) Progressives allege this in complaints in 1938
to Netional Labor Relations Board.
Stipulation entered into by Elsboff, United and Pro~
gressives for a Board order to be enforced by Court
Decree for Mine "B" to cease refusing to negotiate
with Progressives,
{1) This appears to be a eontredietory attitude
for Elsboff to have adopted and any circum
stances which tend to explain it would be
helpful.
Elshoff contesting court's jurisdiction after order
wae antared and Aanwines wintatian af Goewits anlar.
(1) This appears inconsistent with Flahoff's having
extered into the stipuletion. How is this ex-
plained? . ,
Reopening of Mine on November 6, 1939, on open shop
basis,
(1) What caused this im face of the Court Decree?
(2) Knowledge of Elshoff at that tine that mem
verabip of Progressives head falien off.
Partialityin employing United members when Mine opened
on November 6, 1959, on open shop basis.
(1) Specific instances of partiality.
(2) Instractions to that effect by Elehoff,.
{S$} Elahotfts knowledge of diserimination.
Explanation of Elshoff's attitude when he wrote to
Bimondson December £26, 1940, refusing to recognize
United until National Labor Relations Board 80 ore
dered hig. ;
(1) Was this to cause an election to be held, he
being aware that United men had a majority?
(2) Apparently in July, 1940, the United Mine
Workers began to obtein a majority. Did
ee ee A2 a
Eiehorr have knowleage of thist
{At the present time, the files of the NLRB are being analyzed by a mesber of |
my staff.An analysis of every lead in those files relating to unfair lebor
practices by Elshoff will be set out in a supplemental memo which will be
aed ahat tn the Piresn Unndew ay Prasdav. Arrancamants are being made to
CS CY MM AA VE Awe UTS Oey = —— SSS
vat
AUsus,e
SS
obtain photostatic eoples of any documents in these files deemed essential
for your purpose.?
ne ne te Lg MPS tet = - .
—"*
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic