Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John L Lewis — Part 1
Page 27
27 / 79
EN TAL ~2-
Section 7 in explicit language states that employees shall
have the rights therein enumerated. Legislative history of the
Act makes it clear that these rights are secured only against
the employer or those in connivance with him, These rights are
Rsecured by the laws of the United States" within the meaning of Section 51.
Memorandum for the Director Bvt
BACKGROUND FACTS
It is alleged that the/frogressive Mine Workers of America Union |
was formed in 1932 as a revolt ageinst an effort by John L. Lewis to force a |
reduced wage scale upon the miners in Illinois, which theretofore had been
the stronghold of the United Mine Workers of America Union. A referendum of
the miners had rejected the reduced scale. During a second referendum, the
ballot boxes were mysteriously stolen and lewis declared an emergency and i
simed an agreement with the mine operators. It was stated that 25,000 miners
revolted against this agreement and set up # new organization called tne
Progressive Kine Workers of Amica, which grew rapidly and soon dominated
the entire State. It is alleged that Lewis bitterly swore to win back the
lost territory and break the rebel union, It was also stated that Mine B
was the stronghold of the Progressive Mine Workers Union and was located in
Springfield, Illinois, Lewis' former home and present legal residence,
¥
i
According to the Department's memoranda, from 1932 to 1941, @
bitter struggle for supremacy was carried on between the Progressive Mine
Workers Union and the United iiine Workers of América, involving much violence.
j In ¥sy, 1937, it was stated that the Progressive Mine Workers, discovered that
(14 of its members were paid spies of the United Mine Workers. | Upon Elshoff's
,Wefusal to fire these 14 individuals, a strike was called and the mine was
‘closed. The mine remained closed until November, 1939, 2} years later. It
was alleged that during this period, the United Mine Workers paid Elshoff
£150,000 in sums varying from $1,000 to $20,000. It was further stated that
during this period and coincident with the payments of money, Elshoff was sus-
pected of unfair labor practices against the Progressive Mine Workers. After
the mine opened, the United Liine Workers continued the payments to Eishoff
until the total of $225,000 had been paid. It was also stated that in
August, 1937, Elshoff recognited and signed a collective bargaining agree-
ment with the United Mine Workers, even though at that time they were in
the minority and did not have enough members to operate the mines,
Allegations have been made that during the period that Mine B was
out of operation, the United Mine Workers proselyted the members of the
Progressive Kine Workers, which, coupled with the alleged unfair practices
- : and deprivation of rights imposed by Elshofif, resulted in the United idine
mre Workers gaining a majority membership by mid-summer of 1940. The United
. Mine Workers petitioned the National Labor Relations Board for an election
CUNDCL ALI
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic