Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John L Lewis — Part 6
Page 24
24 / 55
-ill-
C. UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES FROM JANUARY 4, 1958,
TO NOVEMBER 7, 1939, -- THE PERIOD OF SIEGE
AND STARVATION. ;
After his attempt to reopen the mine on January 4, 1938,
failed, Elshoff kept his mine closed until November 7, 1939 --
twenty-two months later. During this time, the Progressives claim
they were constantly seeking to negotiate a contract with Elshoff
pursuant to which the mine sould be reopened. Two principal alle-
gations of unfair labor practice, therefore, are suggested during
this period:
(1) That Elshoff Continued the Shut-Down in Order to Assist U.M.W.'s
ogram to Destroy the Progressive Organization.
There is no direct evidence now available which indicates
that this was Elshoff's purpose. The circumstantial evidence, how-
ever, strongly points that way. It is difficult to understand why
Elshoff--assuming he intended to repay the U.M.W. "loans"~-was
willing to keep the mine closed and thereby incur huge losses.
Elshoff's statement suggests that he feared to reopen the mine
because of possible violence between the two unions. This suge
gestion is discounted by the fact that in the fall of 1937 he
obtained an injumction against the Progressives on the theory
that he wanted to open the mine with the U.M.W. furnishing the
employees. Inquiry is requested to ascertain whether there was
any basis for Elehoff's excuse. Evidence on this point, of course,
must necessarily be of a negative character, but all information
bearing on Elshoff's true reason for keeping the mine closed should
be obtained.
(2) That Elshoff Refused to Bargain with the Progressive Union, as
Require the Labor dot.
It was the contention of the Progressives that throughout
the period when the mine was closed, Elshoff refused to bargain
collectively with them. It was asserted that he would fail to
appear at meetings, would postpone meetings, and when he did
appear to bargain with the Progressives, he would just go through
the motions and would not actually bargain in good faith with any
réal intention of reaching an agreement,
The following National Labor Relations Board photostats
have a bearing on the two alleged unfair labor preotices set out
abover
B-15 Exhibit 6 ~ affidavit, dated Jan. 18, 1938,
Dillon, Schewe, Crompton, and Schneider, and
Stipulation and Agreement, Ex. T.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic