Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John L Lewis — Part 31
Page 77
77 / 82
° fr Sellers, Divernan, Tilincis, a Progressive union check
weighman, states t shortly after he made up certain tonnage sheets oa
January 31 seat at the company office he went out on mind property and
was looking up at the tipple when some man whom he does not know, bat vhou
he understands igfO'Connor, a UXWA employee, sided up to him, and before
he knew it hit in the face. He states that Falsetti, prior to that
time, had walked around in the vicinity and had gone back into his office;
also, the sheriff's deputies were in other parte of the company property.
: Janes’ Schneider, Riverton, Illinois, states that t four
"weeks ago B) Hocklebeck, inthe presence of Oscar and J Faleetti (Oscar
is tie mine mnager ané J Paleetti ie the top toss) ato Schneider,
#Schneider, you've teen ineiting trouble for a long time and you are going
be oot 2 B at aw a ahaet time @haranftar Rshannsn. Taadter of the Twa
U ger ABs 4650, € BOOT 2A SUG eel, Svein, Sees Yee
in the mine, threw a lighted cigarette Inte Schneider's face, Schneider
Teported thie to Faleetti and Falsetti stated that all eaployses could be
protected while the men were on top of the mine, but not dows below,
Z% should be stated here that these various incidents vill be
taken up tomorrow in the Federal court, as the Progressive Vorere have
{nvoked the 1937 injunstion obtained by the company, an¢ a hearing will
de held toscrrow on a rule to show cause as to why the UXWA may not be
held in oontenupt of that injunction, .
Tane indicated that there were many more of these incidents that
have happaned in the past month or so, but that thase were samples of the
various types of intimidation going on. Kane stated that while 1¢ gould
not be proved that the company porticipated in these acts, and the United
Kine Yorkers were gutex noting ae agents for the company, nevertheless the
company by acquiescing tn such and taiing no action, was really ratifying
these intinidatory acts, Kane stated that tha company could revoke the
1937 fajunction if it so desired and that the cape , using the defense of
having sheriff's deputies on alne property wae reali z not a defense is
good faith, as it was at the request of the Provrasaives that the sheriff's
ésouties were placed around aine property, Fans atated that what he de
aired was the notice, as mantionsd ‘;ralntefore, ad ha thought that it
ight hava the effect of hav’ : emmloyees fraer to vote as thay desired.
Fane'a theory fe that if the... sesrcive lncidents sontlas enoloyess hay not
vote as they dasire, tut may vote for the United Hine Yorkers, ao that all
thie would be atopped if the United “ine Workers became the exclusive bar=
gaining agent. The szaniner atated that ha would report his findings te
the Acting Regicnal Director, °
MaR/ Jac
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic