Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John L Lewis — Part 32
Page 26
26 / 78
my
Referring te paragraph 1 of Urs, Stern's neneraaéun of December.
#1, 1940 in which 4¢ ts stated that further Lawstigation should be mée
of the alleged ineldents in which applisants for neuberehip wore
gobe either fer thenselves or panbere of their families an condition of
Joining the United Wine Werkers; in interviewing the eight-feur new
eupleyeos the twe Bxminers atteupted te aeeure additional {nfermtion om
this peiat bat were unsuseosefui. It will be noted that every ene of
the eighty-few dented that any nenber of the Pregroseives or of the
United asaisted than te get jobs exoayt apprentices whe had never belonged
te any organisation priser te their empleynent at Mins 3B ond We othore
whe secured emypleynent threugh relative.
Referring te Mre. Stern's neworandcum of Seesnter Fist vharsia
At te etated that the Progressives allege that the eonpany has boon
Vargeining with represextatives ef the Thited Mine Verkers in respeset te
gricvaneess and has agreed te reesgriae United chook weighmen, this has
already been partly severed above. It will be reealled thet Company
Attorney Ensel sentends that the etate law required the ecupany te provide
feeilitiecs fer tnited shook weighnem, Kamminer sesured a oepy of the
general sinisg lawe of the State of Iliinols,and a eepy of same is attached,
The refersnee will be fowd in paragraph 27, page SB.
It seams winesessary te dwell further on this partioular phase
ef the alleged refusal te bargain.
The second paragraph water (2) in Mre. Stera’s vi..7rantm
refers te page 9 of Exsménor's report whieh has te de with the dirty ceal
funds, This matter wos perhaps not mde sufficiently elear in the
report ef Osteber 4th. The eumpany has sulmitted two affidavits, beth
dated danwary 7,-1841, ome signed by Carl Eishoff, President ef the
Company, whisk i2 attached herete as Exhibit III; the ether elgned ty
Lee Easel, Attorney for the company, which is attashed herete as Bxchibit
IV. Exzeminer belicves that these twe exhibite clarify this phase ef the
In the third paragraph under (2) Mrs. Stern's memorandm of
Desender Dist states thet there would seam to be on incensistency between
Bisheff's pecition as set fer’ om page £2 of the Osteber 4th report te
the effeet that he weuld sign ne contract of any kind, and the cempany‘'s
peeition fa set ferth on page 85 that these mectings constituted an agree~
mont between the Fregressives and the eompamy. It should be peinted out
ageim that the decunent in the file sulmitted by the Progressives purports
te be the minutes of a meeting held in Fstewry, 194 during the nogetiae
tions between the conpany and the Pregressives, but that these purperted
minutes are net signed end there is ne infermation as te who made these
minutes or how they came to be in the file. Furthernere, Mr. Kleheff has
denied in the presense of Regional Directer Puttersen and Field Rxeminer
Clark that he ever mde such a statenext.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic