Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Profumo Bowtie — Part 3
Page 23
23 / 49
¥
3
'
°
'
|
this point. The decision was recorded in this minute bY a Supeitendent of
“The Chiet Superintendent of Criminal Investigation does jiot propose
making another appointment (for Ward), nor does. he intaia® to have
Miss Keeler seen. I told the Chief Superintendent that this wag agreeable
to Special Branch and we are not asking him to take any offer action.”
86. It is quite plain from this last sentence that the Superintendent of
Special Branch did not regard it as important to see Christine Keeler. He
told me that he thought the crime interest was greater than any security
risk. Accepting this view, nevertheless in view of Christine Keeler’s statement
to Detective-Sergeant Burrows it does appear that there was a security
interest which should have been watched: and the Deputy Commander of
Special Branch certainly intended her to be seen,
(vii) Stephen Ward tells the Police
87. So much for Christine Keeler’s statement. There was & statement
by Stephen Ward at this time which was also of importance. On 4th February,
1963, at 6.20 p.m., Stephen Ward himself telephoned to the Marylebone Lane
Station and said that two photographs had been stolen from him. They were
photographs taken at the swimming pool at Cliveden. One was taken by
Mr. Profumo and showed Stephen Ward with three girls, one of whom was
Christine Keeler. Mr. Profumo had written on it “ The new Cliveden Set, J.’.”
The other was taken by someone else showing Mr. Profumo with two
girls, one of whom was Christine Keeler, The Marylebone officers asked him
to come to the station and he did so on Sth February, 1963. Stephen Ward
said he thought Paul Mann had stolen the photographs to sell. He also made
this statement (I give it from the note made by the officer as it was
reported to his superior):
“Dr. Ward said that, if this matter, including the association 1 between
Mr. Profumo and Miss Keeler, became public, it might very well ‘ bring
down’ the Government. He also added that he had no personal liking for
this Government but would not like to see it go out of office in this
way. He also said that he was aware that Miss Keeler had sold her
‘life story to the Sunday Pictorial newspaper and that a number of names
would be mentioned. Ward also said that he was a close friend of the
Naval Attaché of the Soviet Embassy, who frequently visited him and
who was known in diplomatic circles as ‘Foxface’. He produced a
photograph which he said had been taken at an official Iron Curtain
and in it he appeared standing alongside ‘ Foxface*. He also said
he had mentioned the matter to a member of MI. 5.”
88. “It is to be noticed, too, that this statement of Stephen Ward's
contained direct reference to two important matters--the association of
Mr. Profumo and Christine Keeler, and Stephen Ward's
Wanov.
(viii) The Police tell the Security Service
89. We have at this point, therefore, two important to the
police—one by Christine Keeler on 26th January, 1963, and the other by.
Stephen Ward on 5th February, 1963. The Marylebone officers embodied
28
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic