Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Profumo Bowtie — Part 3
Page 26
26 / 49
re rd “Yo
a we : vet Paton a
tee OG
a
ete Re
94 No one can understand what happened at this time unless he realises
the extreme anxiety felt by Stephen Ward, Mr. Profumo aad, I may add, Lord
Astor, over the critical 10 days, Monday, 28th January, 1963-Wednesday,
6th February, 1963. They were very anxious that nothing should be disclosed
prejudicial to their good names. Each instructed lawyers to protect his interests.
And, as it happened, the main burden was borne by Stephen Ward's
Counsel(?) and by Mr. Profumo’s solicitors.) By Friday, Ist February, 1963,
they had discovered these disturbing facts:
(1) They got to know Christine Keeler had signed a conditional contract
paid down: but they did not know what her story contained. in
particular they did not know what she had told the newspaper about
Stephen Ward, Mr. Profumo or Lord Astor, They got to know that
arrangements had been made for her to sign the proofs of her story
early in the week beginning Monday, 4th February, and also for her
to be accommodated, at the expense of the newspaper, in a flat at The
White House, Albany Street. Once the proofs were signed by her as
correct, the newspaper would be free to publish the article without
fear of any libel action by her, though they would, of course, be liable
to libel actions if they made defamatory statements which were untrue
about anyone cise. .
(2) They got to know that the case of John Edgecombe was in the list
Tuesday, 5th February, and Christine Keeler might have to attend any
day. The case was expected to be tried that week, and should be
finished by the Friday. Christine Keeler was to be an important witness
and might be subjected to cross-examination as to her credit and as
to her character, and she might bring out their names. Until the trial
was over the newspaper might not feel able to print her story, because
the matter might be prejudicial to the trial and a contempt of court.
Once the case was over the newspaper would be able to publish the
articles without fear of being in contempt of court.
: (ii) Plans to Stop Publication
95. It was important therefore to do everything possible in law to stop
the newspaper publishing the story of Christine Keeler. Here the Jawyers
were in a difficulty. In the ordinary way it is very difficult to get an igfjmction
to stop the publication of defamatory matter: for if the defencduplk s
that the words are true and that they intend to justify them, thecal
rarely intervene to stop them: for the court will not pre-judge tha
Rta way Aad eee Be Sake
whether the words are true or not. But in this case there ap are ‘a way
cna Stephen Ward's Counsel was Mr. Rees-Davies, M.P. in all the stages in this
apter.
“ (') Theodore Goddard & Co.
A
$1
r
‘%
=
d
to sell her story to the Sunday Pictorial for £1,000, of which £200 was .
for trial at the Session at the Central Criminal Court starting on
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic