Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Profumo Bowtie — Part 3
Page 32
32 / 49
'
.
Fy
4
t
Te: rome
_ ‘113. - The Ministers were ¢ concerned ft from a very early stage. Me, Profikaao
saw the Attorney-General on 28th January, 1963, ‘before he saw asty Sivyer
of his own. And a week later, on 4th February, 1963, he saw the Chief Whip.
These Ministers Played a very important part in what took place.. os
(i) The Law Officers
t14. No one can understand the part played by the Law Officers in
the Profumo affair unless he realises that by a convention which is well
accepted, any of the Ministers of the Crown {who thinks he may be involved
jn litigation) is entitled to consult the Law Officers and ask their advice.
of particular, when 2 Minister feels that his good name is being assailed,
he is entitled to consult the Law Officers and ask them whether anything
said about him is actionable as a libel or slander: and if it is, whether it
is convenient from the point of view of the Government that he should
bring an action.°
115. It must also be remembered that at the end of January, or early
February, 1963, the Law Officers were closely concerned with Lord Radcliffe’s
enquiry into the Vassall case. They had given advice to the Ministers whose
names were mentioned there. They had very much in mind the position of
Mr. Galbraith. Here was a Minister against whom allegations had been
ecinnad bi buy im i
made, and who had resigned his office. Rumours had spread about him in
the Press and in the House of Commons. Yet the evidence against him had,
in the course of the inquiry, been shown to be utterly false, and the charge
had been disproved. The inquiry had not been concluded—it was not
concluded until 5th April, 1963—but the Law Officers had already heard
enough to be able to form a good opinion as to the outcome.
116. Such is the background. On 28th January, 1963, Stephen Ward's
counsel asked to see the Attorney-General. The Attorney-General was
engaged at the Wassall case. So the Solicitor-General saw him instead.
Stephen Ward’s counsel told the Solicitor-General that a young gir! proposed
to write a story for a newspaper, telling of her relationship with various
people, amongst whom was Lord Astor and Mr. Profumo. The Solicitor-
General felt that, as Mr. Profumo’s name was mentioned, the Law Officers
were interested. And when the Attorney-General got back from the Vassall
case at 4.30 p.m., the Solicitor-General said to him: “Here is another of
these rumours concerning another Minister, Mr. Profumo”. As a Minister
was involved the Attorney-General thought it was his duty to see whether
he was going to bring a libel action and, if so, to say he was available to
help. So the Attorney-General wrote him a note asking him to come and
see him. And that night at about 11 p.m. Mr. Profumo went to sea the
Alttoracy-General at his own home: . : one ea
(ii) The Attorney-General Interviews Mr. Profemso se a
117. As this first interview is of considerable importance I
with it in some detail. The Attorney-General began by telling Mr.
4 37
‘“
cS -
Fee en gn ~
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic