Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Profumo Bowtie — Part 3
Page 38
38 / 49
er
In an issue dated 8th March, 1963, this newsletter referred to the fact that
‘the girls had started selling their stories to the Sunday newspapers and
added,
pa
“One of the choicest bits in their stories was a letter, appatentty
signed ‘Jock’ on the stationery of the Secretary for W+t. The allegation
by this girl was that
not only was this Minister, who has a famous
actress as his wife, her client, but also the Soviet Military Attaché,
apparently a Colonel Ivanov. The famous actress wife, of course, would
sue for divorce, the scandal ran. Who was using the call-girl to ‘ milk’
whom of information—the W+r Secretary or the Soviet Military
Attaché?—ran the minds of those primarily interested. in security.”
This newsletter did not come at once to the knowledge of Mr. Profumo or
the Chief Whip or the Attorney-General. They got to know of it about
13th March. ; .
- 134, The question has been asked, Why was not an action for libel
iaken on this publication? It was clearly defamatory of Mr. Profumo. If
he was seeking an opportunity to vindicate himself, why not bring an action?
The answer is this: It was
considered by Mr. Profumo and his tegal adviser
and also the Attorney-General. Mr. Profumo’s legal adviser was disinclined
to take action, He did not think this was the right occasion to sue. ‘The
Attorney-General agreed with this view. The Westminster Confidential had
too small a circulation, and contained scandal about someone else, too, which
ought not to be made public. It was very probable that this publication of
the Westminster Confidential was only the beginning, so that very soon stories
might begin to appear in the national Press. It was better, therefore, to wait
for a more substantial publication. ; Se
135. The opportunity
to refute the rumours was not long in coming.
It came in a fortnight, But it came in an unexpected form. On 2\st March,
1963, Members of Parliament made statements in the House of Commons.
Meanwhile many things had happened. Christine Keeler had disappeared.
She did not appear to give evidence at the Edgecombe trial. And to add to
all the previous rumours, there was a new one, that Mr. Profumo had
helped her to disappear.
43
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic