Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Profumo Bowtie — Part 6
Page 32
32 / 51
_Kii) Reports firet reach the Service of Mr. Pree Ameceet
Christine © sd
259. On 28th and 29th January, 1963, more reports were
the Security Service (from a secret source considered reliable) about’
and his activities. They learnt now for the first time that Mr. Profumo" was
said to have an association with Christine Keeler. They were told that Ward
had stated that the girl had been visited several times by Mr. John Profumo
and by the Russian Assistant Naval Attaché, Captain Ivanov: that
Mr. Profumo subsequently had a prolonged affair with Christine Keeler and
two very amorous letters signed by him had been given by her to the Sunday
Pictorial ; that the Russians were so certain that a scandal was brewing that
Ivanov had been told to leave on 29th January, 1963. (Fhe Security Service
already knew that Ivanov was leaving on 29th January, 1963.) It should be
noticed that Stephen Ward said on several occasions that he told the Security
Service of the association as long ago as 12th July, 1961, but I am satisfied
he did not telf them anything about it and they learnt it now for the first
time.
fiv) ist February, 1963—An Important Decision
260. On the morning of Ist February, 1963, these reports were considered
by the Head of the Security Service with some of his senior officers: and he
came to this important decision: It was not within the proper scope of the
Security Service to inquire into these matiers. These were his reasons:
(1) He thought it was possible that Christine Keeler had been
Mr. Profumo’s mistress. But he did not think it was the function of
the Security Service to find out whether she was his mistress or not.
It was a purely personal side of his life which the Security Service
were not concerned to look into. “~
(2) It would be a security matter if Mr. Profumo was sharing a mistress
with a Russian Naval Attaché—if it meant that there was a flow of
_secret information passing through her from one to the other. But
lvanov had now left the country. So any present tisk had gone. And
there was no reason to suppose that any information had passed from
Mr. Profumo through the girl, Mr. Profumo, whatever might be his
private life, was a wholly reliable Secretary of State for War and it
was Tot to be supposed that he had given away secret information.
The only security point was the possible leakage of information
through Stephen Ward to Ivanov. As to this, Mr. Profumo had been
warned by Sir Norman Brook and there was no reason to think that
he had not heeded the warning.
261. So on Ist February, 1963, the Head of the Security Service gave this
important ruling: ©
“Until further notice no approach should be made to anyone. jn the
Ward galére, or to any other outside contact in respect of it. Hf we are
approached, we listen only.” — ; 7 Co
(v) A Call at Admiralty Honse ee
7 Pe a a ane =tes —— _'
262. In the evening of ist February, 1963, thete was an important Can
from Admiralty House to the Security Service. The Director-General had
already left, so the Deputy Director-General went round. The Prime Minister's:
87
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic