◆ SpookStack

KC 58-75 ff o Nee’ with respect to the parole of Dh LUCIA, GIOE ard Ca PAGA, advised that he had cheexed with CHARLES (CHERRY NOTE) GIOQ0 a the hospital in Leavenworth, and that approximately three months before he went tefore the Farole Boord. GIOE told nam that he wee coing to make parcle and thal. it was costing #300,000.00, which sz would alse take care of his buddies who were involved in his case. He advised that GIG: tole him FISHFE, the parolc officer at Chicago, was to receive 100,000.00, and that most of the remainder would yo : to WILSON, Chairwan of the Parole Board. GIOk then stated that 4a few . smeli favors were to be taken care of after the release was effected. GICE stuted that an attorney named FREEVER or RIEVER in Chicage wes to make the pay-off, and thut JacK GUZIK was to raise the money ard was to obtain this money from each of the subjects! families; that in acdition to the money contributed by the families of subjects, GIZIK was to contribute a large sum obtained from incone of ti gambling syndicate in Chicago which GICE claims netted $500,060.00 per weeks GIOE vols that CUZIK has until Christppeepo ive, and that he is going to give him a Cnristmas present, dvised trat GIOLZ was scre at GUZIK because of a raw deal GUZIK pulled witn some weongy obtained frou CLOS'S interest in slot machines in Chicago. = acvised that he personally saw a letter which GIOE received row HatticY ASH of the Crime Comission in Chicago, stating that GIub should submit his name tc the_Parole Board so that he, ASH, could be named us parole advisore ‘tates that this letter was seen by other inmates bat that he would not disclose their names because of his own personal safety. He advised that GIOE had never made any renarks indicating that Mr. YEAGLEY, the Parole Advisor at Leavenwort!, was involved in any wave The chronological ferms showing Special Purpose letters and other INatters of intrest relating te GIO® reflect that o letter wes sent to HARLY A. ASH, attorney, Chicago, advisinr him that with respect to his request to act as parole advisor for GICh, the request nad iven Submitted to the Parole Executive, and that. he would be notificd of the Roard's cecisicn. It is not known whether or not the letter referred tc is in response to Mr. YEaGLEY'S letter to ASH on Itay 22, 1947, but it is possible that this may be the case, and that ASH may have written to GIO advising him that he was going to act as parole advisor i: he Was permitted to do so. -_ i