Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
John Handsome Johnny Roselli — Part 1
Page 75
75 / 90
a | _ st jeobl
Chicago File 58-194 my
The following investigation was conducted by Special 5
on Uctober 5, 1947. J 7c
GEORSE BIEBER, Attorney, 160 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, was interviewed at
his office. He stated that he had read about the parole of the subjects in
instant case and stated emphatically that he had not participated in any way no
whatsoever in securing the parole of these men. Ha stated further that he eee te
knows nothing about the manner in which such parole was obtained, and doubted” :
seriously that the allegations made in the paper relative to someone being
paid off are correct. He states that he does not know who would be paid off °
to secure such paroles. He stated that he was not acquainted with any of the
Federal Farols members in Washington, nor was he acquainted witn the Parole
Officer here in Chicago, whose name is CHAXLES FISIEK. He stated also that ne”
was not acquainted with the Parolees or their attorneys, viz., PAUL DILLON of ~
St. Louis, Missouri, and EMANUEL STSHN of Fargo, North Dakota. -
he is acquainted with KUSENE BERUSTEIN. de stated that he knows GIOE to sea him
on the street. However, he has never personally met him or represented him, *
and doubts if Gluz knows him by name. In this connection, BIEBER stated that he., _
had never represented any of the Parolees at any time, nor has he ever been’ way
associated with their counsel.
7
BIEBER stated that he
misinformed about the
believed that DOKEKTY of the "Chicago Tribune" was
entire parole matter, end that he believed it was an
effort on the part of DOHLRTY and the newspaper to write something sensational.
He cited his own case in which the newspapers have made a lot of general .- 7
comments with no basis for same.
He stated that-<". 3
a eh y ote:
BIEBER went on to state that in his opinion the Parolees were not guilty in the:..”
first instance, and the stories told by the co-defendants BRUWNE and BIOFF were- *
falsehoods. ie stated that it appeared in the newspaper that the Judge himself
stated that the stories told by both BRUWNE and BIOFF could not be believed. °*
In view of the fact that these Parolees were incarcerated based primarily on.
the information furnished by BROWN and BIOFF, BIEBER was of the opinion that
they were more than deserving of a parole. He stated that he knew nothing about
the alleged passiny of money to the local Parole Officer, CHARLES FISHER, or
to any of the members of the Federal Parole Board. !
BIEBER concluded his statements by stating that he had no connection whatsoever ie
with the entire matter.
Sli men all
4
fe.
!
ha
Pres Dae Asanti ws a
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic