◆ SpookStack

Chicago File No. 58-194 wt DEW: LLL i eh ner , On Qctober 9, 1Sh7, : By + iy 3 i rest Jackson Street, Cnicago, Tilinois, were interviewed in Fegard to the identity of the agent that represented their company at the ' . time the bail bonds were posted for the subjects in this case in 193, and. for information regarding the individuals putting up the necessary collateral | in connection with these bail bonds, QD sisted that the original contact of the American Casualty Company with the subjects regarding bail bonds came about through an attorney named GSORCE a ALLAGHAN, who was : a the subjects.in the bond matter, and who was a personal. friend of Agcon die -— hiiabicieate contacted an a ingur ance broker by the Plame © Chicago, who, in turn contacted MMof the American ferietty Company, and ., made arrangements for the placing of the bail bonds for the subjects. : eer ee rears stated that they iad no files of the bail bond transaction except for a sn file showing the names of the individuals putting up collateral for the bond and Dun and Bradstreet resorts on individuals who did put up this collateral. The file contained a typewritten list of individuals,” | showing their names, addresses, amount of collateral, type o: collateral, and - ee t iF bank unen which draw, and, according (iB was originally prepared for goa f “) in «: the Internal Revenue Desartment in 19h3. “Sb 76 ek i: In connection with the supjlying of this information ee tated that at the time Pr equested a list of a donors of collateral, that they nad refused to give this information to They 7 further stated that at a later date, they appeared before Federal Judge HOLLY = in the Northern Distric> of Illinois, and after a discussion, it was agreed upon that the information would be furnished to the Internal Revenue Depart- ment. They stated that the reason that the information was not originally given ta@MP wes because of the fact that they considered this information a of a confidential nature. ; " ~ wf & rt Tho total amount of collateral put up by the various individials, according to : en was azproximately $500,000.00. Howéver, after an examination] an . : of the list in the file, it was ascertained that the total sh on this list at en ae “twas only $386,000.00. Both men stated that the discrepancy of $112,000.00 a a7. could not be accounted for except that they thought the individuals listed. eae 7 possibly come into their office at a later date and hed added additional moneya : oor »{ for collateral. CO GRA ‘ oe