◆ SpookStack

Pe Atlanta 58-62 ae: D'ANDREA was brought before the disciplinary board at inh in it was recommended that he forfeit 150 days good time for conniving in connection With the first infraction of the rules as explained above. On the same date DZ LUCIA was up before the board for complicity in trying to influence an inmete in the prison laboratory to return a positive sugar count in his _ urine so he could be or the diet lines The ivarden recommended that he . oo... ., forfeit 240 days good time, ; ie Warden SANFORD stated that covies of these recommendations in the ae Atlanta Penitentiary files concerning these two prisoners were signed by the ~ chairman of the disciplinary board at that time, namely THOMAS J. GOUGH, Associate Warden, but were not signed by him or the other members of the beard. According to Mr. HERBERT COX, associate warden at the present time, the other menbers of the disciplinary board on the occasions when these two ’ prisoners were heard were isl TEX SCHULTZ, Chairman of Industries at the Prison, 3, 4, and Brij OVERSTREKT, then assistant warden. Warden SANFORD advised that, . ns oo according to the copy of the good time forfeiture board report which was in 2 wei 4 the files of D'ANDREA and DE LUCIA, the good time forfeiture recommendation was not in effect since neither he nor other members of the board had signed ~”” < it. He stated ne did not recall why he had not signed these recommendations, PT as but probably the reason would be contained in the main file of these prisoners .« at Leavenworth, or there might be something in the Leavenworth files which would help nim to recall why he had not signed the reportae rE . ad ~ REFERRED UPON COMPLETION TO TH OFFICE OF ORIGIN = - ; i f Ea ' wo ; ~ t re nk ae Sean rfid enue RE aha eed ye a ar ne * oan wT}. ine “= * SAE "mae. - ~ . Rebs ter yas ee