◆ SpookStack

DEW; EBD Chicago file 58-194 x The pail investigation was conducted by Special a 4 - On September 29, 1947, SAMUEL H, SHAPINO, attorney with offices at 38 South atl : i Dearborn Street, Chicaco, Illinois, was intervieved and advised he had known ~~ f Das 5 D'ANDPEA for approximately twenty years. He stated that his wife's father rand, tee D'ANDREA'S fatner were brothers. Ctr s ay, mer _ According to SHAPIRO he handles no criminal cases but for many years has ; nandied’s, e D'ANDREA'S civil matters, He stated he does this work because of the. family . a. 5 a connections between D'ANDREA and himself. or n : ror Wreopa be Ten SHAPIRO stated he hag visited DIANDREA approximtely twelve times, the main = | t.. } purpose of these visits being the discussion of the sale and management of . a real estate owned by D'ANDREA. He added he might have discussed parole matters at any one of these visits; however, the main purpose of the visits. was athe +- Pie a1 aa 1Gadi Vo tat o . x wes, SHAPIRO advised tnat he had handled a fund of money in the amount of $4272. : for D'ATDREA which was a fund derived from the sale of real estate ‘located. ag in Glencoe, Illinois. He added he had paid expenses of JO'UN R, ROBINSON in a re the amount of 5100 when ROBINSON made a special trip to Washington in connec= =.) '4 tion with D'ANDREA'S parole. He had paid various sums to D'ANDREA'S wife © « ¢ when she so yequested. lig had paid his ovm expenses on his trips to visit .° f+ 5 D'ANDERA in tne penitentiary and he had paid various real estate taxes and . income taxes from this fund, Ile stated that at the time D'ANDREA was re~ . _- A leased, the balance of the fand was returned to D'ANDREA and it is his opins @ V7.7" .. ion that this balance was used to partially pay the attorney fee of EMANUEL . ee eye STERN, attorney who represented D'ANDNEA in his recent parole. es SUAPIEO stated he did not know the other four subjects in this case and that for his parole, and that he has no knowled ge of money being paid by the other !- subjects for the securing of their parole. SHAPIRO stated that his reagon - “4 ie % fF Z he knew tnat STECN represented only D'ANDREA during the parole Proceedings’ = gd 7 SuAPTRO stated that he knows of no irregularities in connection with the. eS an ; curing of the parole for D'ANDREA; he is sure no money was paid by D'ANDREA vate vt 2 for saying that D'ANDREA had not paid for his parole was the fact he does not .,; o) believe DIANDPEA hag a sufficient aum of money to pay. Se backed up this state~ ma ment by stating that while D'ANDZEA was incarcerated it Was necessary’ to allem! E a mortgage company to foreclose oh a piece of property’ owed by D'ANDREA on? a 7 - a . he Ashland Avenue in Chicagoe eg eng be Piet feeder i “SUAPIRO stated he did not retain STERN but that he had suggested the. aia of STERN and he believed that TONY D'AMDREA contacted STERN. He said that a " + STERN had been paid 37,000 in all made up of two payments of $3,500 eachs'\The™ we AL on -¢ Soe _ ao He. ne ee Dae A * . Pou - ra ee ne pot ~ nome ANE warts te Ate a ee I "me . nak 7 Pos eee oa - . ee ‘ oe : aoe. Ea cers Se ae 7 wt te a naar