◆ SpookStack

a at his office, Room 218, CYO Center, 31 East Congress Street, by Special La Agent QM assistant Special Agent in Charge RICHARD N. HOSTENY. 4.5 At thewouteee ershop SHEIL was informed the investigation in the instant | nes matter was being conuucted at the specific instructions of the Attorney tpt General and that in view of the fact his name had been mentioned as a suppor ter for the release of subject CHARLES GIOER on parole, he was therefore. being in tervi Roman Catholic Bishop BZiNARD g</SHEIL was interviewed on October 2, 1987, ae 5 weitye oe L ames ol Lercde Bishop SHEIL requested the source of this Bureau's information and was urteously advised the interviewing agents were not at liberty to disclose TE tis source as it was confidential. He stated that previously after hearing rn of efforts to connect his name to this case, he telephonically contacted ve Attorney General TOM C. CLARK and has talked to him on three occasions. He advised that he informed Mr. CLARK he positively had no connections “with ” this case and fully explained his position to the Attorney General, Bishop . ATT an @tatsA he han +h ~h ery SHEIL further stated he had the Attorney General check his files so as to assure the Attorney General the Bishop's name was not mentioned at all. tah ato He further advised that he is blazing about this whole matter, and specifically wae od for the audacity of certain people to even mention his name with such a gang te of hoodluns. oo Bishop SHEIL described this matter as mainly a vicious newspaper activity we ’ to connect his name with this case and said that this newspaper, whose _ identity | he did not care to disclose, had even gone so far as to call over .-. cin . & naanl wf HET ere 100 people and inject his name into the matters Bishop SHEIL further inform ad tad, be ‘that he had persenally told subject CAMPACMA's attorney, SIDNEY KORSHAK, Congressman FRED 5,BUSBEY and all the local newspapers that he would “ AE Ne immediately insti tate suit for slander or libel if they dare cause his name - a ec Ms to be mentioned in this matter. He remarked that this case has been of aR oles extreme annoyence ard embarrassment to him, particularly in view of the fact’ ~"-- that at the recent Eucharistic Congress held at Buffalo, New York, and among the Cardinals there present, “certain unidentified persons caused his ae name to bo linked with the press statement as one of the two prominent toe! Chicagoans active in this matter. He further related that he is incensed . , that the subjects of this case would dare try to use hig name in furtherance le of their efforts to run the City of Chicago, and he remarked he wondered if there was any moral decency lefte wiper it Fy . * a: .* a. Pe ae wy pied . 7” one F hoe is ‘ : thy eee se: ‘ . , ~5le ' cg ® th cw “ orm Bee ze wy . . . . se . . 7 . eae one et ee oye Kt . co ea a a Fey Fe MH , : eo thet ene An RO ~ hemp feb rem at ween - 0 aa