◆ SpookStack

SL 58-64 advancing funds to DILLON on hissbehalf\for any type of job. He further stated that he nad not seen BRADY for a period of at least six montis prior to tne latter's death but did admit that on one occasion he had been in DILICI"'s office with BRADY. However, he did not remember just when this occasion was and would not state why he was in DILION's office on that particular occasion but said that it was not in connection with ‘parole matters of any type. JOHN «. JOYNT, a lawyer with offices at 1221 Locust Street, St- Louis, Missouri, who was formerly a circuit judge for the city of St. lovis, was interviewed at which time he executed the following state- went, the orizinal of which is being transmitted herewith to the Washington Fielo Vivision: "October Lith, 194° "T, JOH: .. evatements T, of I vestizat ons tne following voluntary mf the tederal Hurear "T have been asked as to whether I nad made any contacts in erder to obtain the paroles of certain individual: in commection with. whom Concresesional hearings are being conducted, particulary with b respect to LOU: CAYFAGHA, et al. For tne informition of tie a authorities conducting this investication I wil] state timl at no timo, past or present have I had argthineg te do #ith any such per~ sons or their paroles. In addition, I have not been in any dis- cussion concerning such persons or their parcles ind have no krow~ ledge of tne subject excepting what I have read in the cally press. /s/ JOHN i. JOYUT : louis io." ‘Ky, JOYNT admitted that in abot. 1934 Lo 1736 he te GO BO? york in connestlon with obtaining a parole fer one utile Lan ang stated tnt tae‘bt. Lovis Post-iMspatch" newspaper no. alteed that be . wae artive in connection witn the case of one dita de. moe and indis hed that. thie newcovaper had tried to smear his nane in cuaninetion vith nan eases but emph- tically deried any conection whatsoover «ith the dnsteat ease. LONLE ana LUZ were notorious criminals, who had bean acuive ja the victnity of St. Inuls. ~3-