◆ SpookStack

for thts motion was based on two general grounds: (a) newly discovered evidence and (b) the prosecuting authorities had knowingly used perjuredtestinony to convict the Rosenbergs. Faonuel Bloch, defense attorney, argued that the Greenglaas testimony relating to the console table allegedly gtven te the Rosenbergs by the Russians was falee; further, that statenente the Greenglasses had made to thetr attorneys contradicted the testinony they had gtven at the trial. Bloch algo argued that a deal had been nade between the Governrent and the Greenglasses tn return for thetr teatte mony and that the theft of urantua by Dautd Greenglasse froa Los Alamos was proof that he was engaged tn tndependent — eaptonage and that tn order to save hinself fron prosecution for that theft he falsely tnvolved the Rosenberga. It te noted that David Greenglass testisied at the trial that the Rosenbergs had a console tabla which Julius satd had been given to him by the Russtana. Greenglase further testisted that the table had been hollowed out and was used by the Rosenbergs for photographic purposes. Bloch clained to have recently located the console table tn the home 0 of ire. Sophte Rosenberg, mother of Jultus Rosenberg, and that tt woe not hollowed out or altered tn any wey. Blech alee presented an asftdavtt from € furntture buyer at Mooy’s Department Store, whick affidavit stated that the photograph of thts table resembled a type of table posetbly - 129 =.