◆ SpookStack

ee amen arte inmate Selim SnD re arets ie . _ 7 ner aa — > +7 , ust . a”. Deg cot a + BENS as cry ae a i ee ee te ae reall . : oe nn - . . -, Ct * ta es ake vee F F to the existcnoe of prod: ble Gime is irreviewable, — _ and th: evidence in rebuttcl is never important ss * © eept in 50 fer as he mi~ht Without it hewe founag the evisence of th ascused pcrsuisive. If the proscoution chooses to tuke the ekunoe thet the | insiotiont alone will sctisfy hin, it will alvays | be sufe on h.bens corpus, Perhans the juige who Ord Ts th: renovel mey think othomise, but that -. 15 u ciffcrent qustion, 111 this necessarily (+: folluws fron the relles ttled rule that in such ~ S2Sed~—™.Lich ore only a species of habcas corpus beep in ecn-:rale=:he erit docs not Search the oorrcete Doe, nCSS of the Ovnclusion as matter of fact. It ° | - tay ee only exanincs phothr there vas any evidence whieh f2°"%- Gould fuctify the finiins of probcble oawe, | Otoiza pe c:.,. “14 sf . Fee * ord a . Paar a * r ae a> Fee * $2 Lend. 94; Lyde v. Shine, 199 Usa, 62, 84,..- = 25 SeCte 700, 50 Led, 90; Price v,. Henkel, 216 at Rothier, 264 G3. 309, 44 Secte S60, 68 Le Yd. 7595 282 2 Uaited States ex rel. !uchos v. Gault, 271 U.S,. exe © nocded that the indfotment fs itsclf evidence, ~. 3 = the testimony of th accuse: Oan meet 4¢ only es =f 7S Proof accinst proof, and it vill be alone enouch Type te to sudport the fincing. The rebuttal fs only 2. ise: no cutul:ive, ani ft fe never Bccessary to consider «= O°: it upon haseas corpus," Le * athe + a len Phe 2nd Circutt dourt of 4>9cals in disoussing 55" the two views as ubdove stuted enane to the conclusion ~)*""S- a that es ons us the defeninnt had a full opportunity to - a * put in his proof and it had beon eotually considered 2a ed he could ect no relicf on habeus corpus, She court. ee 7 “re adopted the second vicr thit the indictnent was suffie (oo et: ofent to Justify a ronovil exoent in rare oasen. The ke court reached the conolupsion that tho introduction in ls : evidanoe of the indiotnent tocctier with proof of aera identity was sufficient for raoval without any rebuttal testimony on the p2rt of the cove ramet. ‘ tur thes 5. Orated Sint EHUSP Ot Svetetse ER UR: O220 OF Cnited eres ene =a a . - eae pe ear oy ! Stetc@®, ex Fl Hu-his vy Geult, SVL U5, Ae, ft woule | ete FocusPe a stPon~ abusc of the eomiasioncrts porters Swe 0 *li~