◆ SpookStack

. -_—_- ae ee cm es aL ie gi Ro ol, a AT DAYTON, OHIO | ee [’ . a Photographs of ‘Floyd, on eppearing on 1 Identification order’ i | ~ gna the other secured from the October issue of “True Detective", which a ie ‘Tie @ better likeness of Floyd than that which appears on Identification Order, ...- : a ae a “and which is being made a part of the Gincinnati Office file, were shown. officer: we i Frank McKnes, McKnew inmediately edvised thet he was quité .cortein the was whos: _ ?, “She knee as Norris “wes aleo Floyd. He accampanied agent and the photographa were: / ghom, $o other pers us in Deytén,; Ohia,: wod, inew pnd” ‘had’ doen ‘Horr ie 4nd phey: ite, ob were also of the opinion that Norris and Floyd were one andthe sane ‘perscnj ” me persais to whom the photographs wore shown furnished further informet{on-> relative to the suspicious actions of Norrie, but thie informtion is ‘not: boing’ . Peported in detail due to the fact thet Norrie was arrested at Cinclanst i, Ohio} on the day following agent's inquiries, 10-24-33, as J. Hy Taylor allies pooled + _by Cincinnati, Ohio, Police on a charge of swindling a widow Fesidim in Ean ; Slate _ tucky in the sum of $3,500.00, after promise of marriage, Thies information vas. _ obtained from a Cincinnati newspaper which carried the photogreph of J. Hy. “faylor - mo " pllas Norries’ The photograph of Norris’ dears 4 atrong likeness to -that of Floyas ? ae “ase A -Gpecial Agent N. B, Kein obtained the fingsrprint Clasgifigation of Norris tras: fet. ‘the Cirncinnats Police Department and by comparison with the fingerprint elesetty- Te + gation on Identification Order issued tor Fhoya, it wes, proven tat Borris and” Floyd were not the same, - . . : oe ‘, wk - nn ee ae 5 — os vt: .-. he Oklehoma City Office forwarded to the Cincinnati’ Office % a’ ; post cera eidreseed to the Sheriff at Oklehoma City fran a Mre. Walter Gibbs, * md co $21 EB. 12th St., Cincinnatt, Ohio, which requested informtion ms to whether -.* “or bot Subject Harvey J. Balley ever lived at 125 EB. Btte dve., St. Louls, Mo. “ ‘and whether or sane vas ever e member, of the eang at Ste Toul.» nown | as° he “Eagen Raters es ee po eth Bs Boke wR Poe BA 2 ag ts ~ es ee ote ‘ ee, ‘welter Gibbs was Oe aatheat et Sei z er ates ‘cinctoness:! . “onior=aba anes ‘that she married Walter Gibbe 10-1-32; ‘that Walter Gibbe 49°5°* 5 @eseribed as being 41 yeare of age, &' 7% in height, weight 190 lbs. blue eyes; a LO derk brown hair, fair complexion, tattoo of nude woman on right s#rist, Nationality ° “2, Use 8, born but, belf-breed Indian, She advised that she sasualiy met her. busband ©: *.>"- ¢, 5,4n Cincinm ti, Obio,’a short tite tefore théir marriage and that efter her mer-; “vlage to him ashe noticed he acted ‘very. “unusual at ‘times and that he often: re: a colved mail at ganoral delivery, Cincinnati, Ohio,” which hé would nover “ehow | ak. - ‘her; that be once told her he was connected with the gang in St. Louis known, aa ne - Regen Rate*; thet in November, 1952, he left her “suddenly, ne hight saying ‘that. 3i1.< he hed feceived @ call, but refused to téll her wherd he ws going and “ypon his _return approximately two monthe later, hé also bad wefuedd So infom her where::’ +! he hed’ been or what the nature of his business hai been; thet ehe found a ticket on :on one of hie ‘plecea of luggage which. hei a return. address of Henry ‘Bailey, 225° 2" ag, Btta ‘Aves, St. Louis, Moe She stated she questioneé ber hi cdbanl as to who 2s this Bailey wee and thet he infarmd her it was none of her business. She further . stated that soon efter that time her husband gein left har and that ehe has not seen him since, Mra. Gibbs was uneble to furnish agent with my furtheyinforme- tion relative to her husband and informed thet she hed been reading the news- papers relative to the arrest of Subject Harvey Balley end that she thought possibly her husband may be connected in sane way with Harvey Bailey, duo to the fact that the return address on one of his begs ¥ was Henry BeNeyy | st. Louke, Moe as athe 4