Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Katherine Oppenheimer — Part 1
Page 7
7 / 18
os Spanish Loyalists, ‘and records of the Wererans of the “Abraham. ~"
‘Lincoln Brigade indicate he died October 13, 1937, In Fuentes, . 9
Spain. Hts wife was listed in the records as Kitty Dallet,. . mes
<2 208 Soutih-t3rd Street, Philadelphia, Pa.
wo, Mies con Dr. Stewart Harrison advised that after Dallet's death ~~.
Retherine Oppenheimer was cnntacted by Steve Nelson in Paris, — ;
“= Bpance, and Nelson arranged-for-her to.return tothe U..8,. Ino -.~
=<. "1938 ‘she married Dr. Stewart Harrison, a member of the faculty
“of the California Institute of Technology. She obtained a div~
-.gonee from Harrison at Virginia City, Nevadas on November 1,
oy Joa Supe, taoe Hameteon
oo. >. BR peview of avallable facts pertaining to the subject °°
itty Harris shows that she was born May 2; 1089, or May ch. .
1699, at San Francisco, according to records of the. Department
of State. Her father was listed as Nathan Harrison. Several.
informants advise that an individual by the name of. Kitty Har-
&: : resided with Bari
cameras
sitesi LOC rh
The above |
facts indicate that Katherine Oppenheimer
ts apparently not identical with the subject and no active
investigation, particulariy on a college campus, is warranted
to reslove any questions regarding such identity. Newark is
requested to confine its activity along these lines to a re-
' view of all available facts and report any pertinent facts
which appear to merit attention for consideration in further
clarifying this matter. - .
“Washington Field is requested te conduct a chebk of a ar
“the passport records of the State Department and ascertain
whether the subject was born May 24, 1889, or May 2), 1899,
according to records of the D, partment of State. The Bureau
oe copies of the Washington Field Office report reflecting a
ne review of the records of the Department of State show that
_ two dates were reported and that the matter should be clarified... -
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic