◆ SpookStack

-2- fy Mr. Morris has advised me that he did not intend to copvey to your representatives the impression that sabotage charges could not be brought against those individuals who were involved in the cutting of fire hoses and otherwise interfering with firemen who attempted to put out the blaze at the ROTC building at Kent State University on May 2, 1970, but only that Section 231 of Title 18, U.S.Cc., might, in the final analysis, be a more appropriate prosecutive vehicle to proceed against those persons. He did not, however, rule out the possibility of proceeding against any individual under the sabotage statutes \{ where such a prosecution would be justified by the evidence which might be available. 1] Upon receipt of the results of the additional investiga- tion requested of your representatives in Cleveland, we will promptly advise you of our decision with respect to possible prosecution in this matter. We wench mar aren