Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
65 HS1 834228961 62 HQ 83894 Section 10
Page 85
85 / 184
118 ufo contact
ground were and all in all said, to be convinced that
what we had shown them are ships of extraterrestrial
origin they needed more positive proof or evidence.
One person came up with the scout being a volks-
wagen, you know how they have to make jokes. But
we were treated very nice and in respect, — one
person said to Ingrid, you have something there, —
meaning the films —
"| could see that they had much knowledge, but
could not give themselves away. They did not rid-
icule us, nor the films, nor the whole UFO idea. |
did not go to NASA to convince them, but to cons-
ult them.”
He added:
"This meeting with NASA was a different matter
altogether than the Senate Space committee 2 years
ago with Madeleine and Ingrid, where they received
more ’’Hell’’ than anything else —”
UNQUOTE.
On March 20th, Fred sent me a photostat letter
from the UFO spokesman at the Pentagon in Wa-
shington D.C. (see back pages)
"DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Washington 20330
Office Of The Secretary
Mar 17 1967
Dear Mr. Steckling:
Your letter concerning your unidentified flying
object (UFO) film finally reached my office — —- -
Office of Information for Project Blue Book, the Air
Force UFO program.
The Air Force would be very interested in review-
ing your film. If you would get in touch with me at
the Pentagon, we will arrange a showing for any
Monday which is convenient for you. My number is
0----or0---.-.
Thank you for offering to show your film; | am
looking forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely
signed. George P. Freeman, Jr.
Lt. Colonel, USAF.
Chief, Civil Branch
Community Relations Division
Office of Information.
Mr. Fred Steckling,
Alexandria, Virginia 22312.”
UNQUOTE.
Fred wrote of the visit:
"Our Pentagon visit was Monday March 20th at
2 p.m. at Colonel Freeman’s office. — Madeleine
came along — Several high commission officers rev-
iewed the Sept. 7th film three times, and Colonel
Freeman stated: ’’This is the best film I’ve seen yet.”
and ’’| have never seen anything like this before.”
He told me to inform the UFO investigation comm-
ittee in Colorado — (— the new University of Colorado
UFO investigation study, — R.C.) — and send them
some pictures.
"Madeleine’s and G.A.’s films were already known
to them — from T.V. — and no comment was made on
them. They seemed to know all three of us — Ingrid
was there — they gave this impression.
"The Colonel said: What about the scoutships
we are supposed to have in Dayton?’’ so we ans-
wered, ’’What about and how about it?’’ They did
not confirm anything or otherwise. But here too we
were treated respectfully, and returned the same to
them -.”
UNQUOTE.
Later, | received a fuller description of events.
"When | took the film September 7th, we were
between Mannheim and Frankfurt traveling North. The
time was about 11.45 a.m., no clouds, about seventy
degrees, Fahrenheit. Although power-lines and trees
were flying by, while | took the film, If there was a
station it surely swished by so fast that it was imp-
ossible to make out any signs, etc. In this case you
have to take my word for it. | was already before
alerted of the Brothers before the film, and became
aware of a group of 10 to 12 cigarette shaped
objects high in the sky (12 o’clock up.) | jumped
back to grab the camera, a 8 mm Revere, 30 mm
powerzoom, Chicago build and opened the window
all the way to eliminate any reflections and started
filming. All in all, 6 groups of ten to twelve space-
craft appeared one after another and moved along
the sky like Dolphins in the water, as an example.
Appearing and disappearing, the armada traveled to
about 9 o’clock (position) and disappeared complet-
ely, giving me the privilege to take about 23 feet of
Kodak color film.
"There were quite some people on the train, some
of them looking out of their windows, becoming
aware of the objects. As we could see they all had
big question-marks on their faces. They had never
seen anything like this before. | might add, there
was no fear on their faces. Ingrid and myself also
Glenn, we could hardly believe it, ever to be pres-
ented with such an opportunity of taking that many
ships on film and all at once. We stood on the win-
dow, Ingrid saying only, ’’oh, my God” and our every
hair was standing up at this wonderful sight. We will
never forget this experience and are surely grateful
for it. —”
UNQUOTE.
| wrote to Fred, asking him if | could use his pict-
ures and correspondence in UFO CONTACT. He
wrote back:
”You can go ahead and use what you feel is right
concerning my visit to NASA and the pictures —
"As you know, my work in this cause has no conn-
ections in pleasing my Ego, and therefore it does
not matter to me if my name is used or not. Import-
ant is the work, not us. —
"We all know George Adamski has given much to
this world in knowledge and information and | feel
ufo contact
At that time the Air Force termed the Heflin pict-
ure a hoax.
The ’’Bluebook” report said Heflin’s photo did not
correspond to his description of the round, saucer-
like object.
But since then the Air Force has commissioned
the independent study by the University of Colorado
at Boulder.
From: ’’San Francisco Chronicle”’,
Friday, March 10, 1967.
Credit: Theodore Gray Hullett, San Francisco,
California, U.S.A.
*
Two PCs spot a »saucers«
Two policemen saw an oval-shaped object flash
through the sky yesterday. The officers said the
saucer-like object flew over Strood, Kent, at about
1,000 feet — and had a tail of blue and silvery stars.
Later there was a similar report from Sevenoaks.
(Kent.)
Police at Rochester said: ’’The authorities have
been told.”
From: "Daily Sketch’, London, March 25th, 1967.
*
»The flying saucer that
Andrew saw in Stamford Sky«
Andrew, the eight-year-old son of Mr. and Mrs.
T. H. Hyde, of 59 Scotgate, Stamford, claims to
have seen a ’’flying saucer’ over Stamford on Tues-
day. Aug. 2. He was in his back garden at the time,
and this is how he sketched and described what he
saw:
"| saw this object in the sky twice this morning
between about half-past ten and a quarter to eleven.
It was going very quickly above the clouds. The
first time | saw it, it was travelling in a N. W.
direction, and then about ten minutes later it came
back.
"It was then going in a S. E. direction, and it
made no sound. the shape was round, with black
circles looking like ship’s port-holes round the
middle. There were little things looking like landing
wheels on the bottom.
"There was a cloud of yellow stuff coming out
of the back and there was a ring round the middle
of the object.”
UNQUOTE.
From: A Stamford paper, Lincs. England.
August 1966.
A friend is a person who knows all about
you — and still likes you. Elbert Hubbard.
Literature
»Piece for a jig-saw«
By LEONARD G. CARMP., M.S.I.A. A.R.Ae.S.
author of "Space, Gravity and the
Flying Saucer.”
Here is a book about ’’flying saucers” which can
be of immense interest to both the »converted” and
to the ’open-minded”’, to the lay-person looking for
more corroboration to back up his beliefs in the
reality of visiting space-ships, and to the technically-
minded man who may well be rather surprised at the
wealth of detail of a highly technical nature included
in this work.
Leonard Cramp, who for many years has worked
in both aerodynamics and, more recently, with the
new design principles of the Hovercraft, has succ-
eeded in writing a bookunderstood, by any person
of normal intelligence who can read the English
language.
Piece For A Jig-saw”’ does, in truth, offer a piece
— a very large piece — of that enigmatic jig-saw
puzzle which has undulated and returned along 180
degrees through head-lines of the world’s press for
the past 20 years. Cramp himself has worked on
material for this book for over half that time. It is
12 years since he submitted to the public ’’Space,
Gravity and the Flying Saucer’; — this book is a
natural and elevating follow-up.
Written in a style which is as open and as lacking
in pomposity as the author himself, one finds a patt-
ern developing from each chapter to the next, as he
takes us from his brief but concise "background
material’ of orthodox aerodynamics, curves into a
high trajectory through the experimental X-15 and
the family of rockets, and into the deep blue. One
is almost shocked to find with what ease Cramp
brings us down — not in a capsule supported by
great billowing parachutes, but gently landing in a
field, any field, ready for instant take-off to a far-off
hovering mother-ship.
At least, the mother-ship is there by implication,
because Mr. Cramp, as he says, having ’’set myself
the task of discovering the truth as an engineer’,
arrives, after a volume full of investigation and ex-
perimentation, at the last chapter which is entitled:
"Vindication Of A Scout Ship.”
The last paragraph of the second from last chapter
might well sum up a very large part of the UFO
story. It also sums up the author, a man who succ-
eeded in forming a large group of UFO enthusiasts
from a very hard core of technology, men who know
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic